OK, let's recap. I said:
You ignored the player comment and addressed the Marlins ability to afford him and still field a competitive team:
I posted quotes from your link which seemed to back my contention about the financial issues:
If you want to change the argument to who would be left after a trade and ignore the fiscal situation, that's OK I guess.
But, that's just it, it's anyone's guess who would be included in any such deal, and therefore who would be left to play. But, there's not too much guesswork involved in determining what kind of team payroll they could afford.
Read the article again, it does NOT say they cannot afford him. The article talks it could not be one of those A-Rod type 10 year deals. And given that he is 31, they would more than likely sign him for no more than 5 years. And as far as WHAT kind of team the Marlins would have IF they pulled off this trade, you brought it up, not I:
What would you have, Albert at first, surrounded by some A and AA players?? Anyone of value would be gone in the trade, and they wouldn't be able to afford much else...