The words "premiere" and "first look" were used on the front page. What is the implication of those words ?
Mike, please show me where we said it was an "Exclusive"
Some folks have creative imaginations.
Actually they did, and I have that in writing.No one said "Hey, the SatGuys suck so we're going to exclude them" AAMOF, it's pretty arrogant to think there is a conscious decision to exclude anyone.
Actually for the last few tests there have been a few SatelliteGuys members in them, we just havent said anything. The names you might see at other sites may not actually who you think they are. For example when I go to the other site, I use Logmein.com to login to DBStalk from a friends spare PC so when I access the site I am actually coming in from Chicago.At first I thought it was pretty cool that there were Satellite Guys members involved. Now I'm not so sure.
Mike
Accepted and appreciated.Oh sorry... I didn't see that and didn't type that so for that I am sorry. I do humbly appologize about that. I know I personally never said exclusive.
Again my appologies on that.
I'm not saying that's the sole criteria because I'm not in that loop but it is one of the important ones. That means that they pick for those that post in issues threads...mostly the CE issues threads.
It isn't meant to be exclusionary but I can understand how DirecTV would be limiting the field for their own ease of decision making...good or bad, it is what it is. Since Earl was instrumental in setting up the CE program most of the testing was done at DBSTalk. Not because their any better than anyone else but because the business side of DirecTV has to limit exposure until their products are ready.
I'll never understand how this situation has morphed into them vs. us; we're being excluded on purpose; they're out to get us.
No one said "Hey, the SatGuys suck so we're going to exclude them" AAMOF, it's pretty arrogant to think there is a conscious decision to exclude anyone.
At first I thought it was pretty cool that there were Satellite Guys members involved. Now I'm not so sure.
Mike
.....Ill tell you the truth, they over there are probably scared that if we got the program over here and it caught on and actually ended up surpassing their program, they would be done. We all know that everyone laughs at their dish network side as their dish network moderators cant pull there heads out of their asses. We also understand that each site has its fan boys, hell look at all the fan boys that came out of the wood work just to post in this thread and troll around. All we asked was for equal access to betas and information. Doing so, I think allot of people who are afraid to post and disagree with the information over there as it will immediately get closed or hard deleted.
I hear ya, I really do. I understand the frustration but if you sidestep the whole field test process what do you expect DirecTV to do?Mike I see where your coming from, but the thing that got us all fired up was the fact that Directv Said they would work with us. We have done everything that directv has asked. Things were all peachy until Earl left and as soon as Earl left, In his exiting comments that DBS Talk would be the official home to the CE process. That in part with the release notes just stopping and other things, we started to put two and two together. When the Beta test of the streaming software came up we asked Directv to allow our members into this test as they have the same ability to do what has been going on there. We in turn got the cold shoulder from both places instead of working with us as we asked.
Ill tell you the truth, they over there are probably scared that if we got the program over here and it caught on and actually ended up surpassing their program, they would be done. We all know that everyone laughs at their dish network side as their dish network moderators cant pull there heads out of their asses. We also understand that each site has its fan boys, hell look at all the fan boys that came out of the wood work just to post in this thread and troll around. All we asked was for equal access to betas and information. Doing so, I think allot of people who are afraid to post and disagree with the information over there as it will immediately get closed or hard deleted.
Finally, how can you accurately report if directv is modifying what your reporting. While some has said that they are looking at grammatical and technical stuff. To me it says that Directv cant trust DBS Talk if they are modifying their stuff. These guys are so far up D*'s butt that they cant even realize it, so their skew is viewed. That's the wonderful thing about us is our skew is not viewed as we try to remain and stay independent. Thats why we have CEO's wanting to talk to our member's because we give it to them like how it is. For those who say that were censoring members about the Charlie chat thing. Our members were fully aware when they signed up and showed up that the request was not to post anything on the Internet. It was what was agreed too and nobody objected. In that response they got to see the full uncensored Charlie. For those who wanted to know what was said, well you should have went. I'm sorry to those who couldn't of gone and wants to know what went on. Its just the nature of the beast.
Also, in response to directv wanting people who can post and give them details on what the hell is going on. Its obviously not working over there because I'm still getting audio dropouts on my HDMI port on my HR20-700 as I have been reporting for over 6 months now. Also, if they are ignoring new members then that is going to turn off any future beta testers. I know were willing to work with directv they just need to realize that were not their enemy. We want to report on their products and be just as excited with their products as we are with dish's products. Instead of fighting, let us take the ball and run with it. You might be surprised where we take this ball. After all it can do nothing but good for Directv, They just don't know.
I'm sorry.....I have to repsond to this.
With all do respect....with comments like this....why would you think DirecTV would want to work w/ a site that tolerates comments like that. It is toatlly disrespectful and unprofessional. And yes, DBStalk would not tolerate posts like yours. It really makes this site look like a bunch of whiners. For whatever reason(s) DirecTV decided to scale back the info or not give equal access....it would seem this is not the place for those type of comments for what SG and you guys are trying to accomplish here. I think it really hurts this site to see comments like that really and doesn't lend much credit for which you seek.
When someone agrees to field test a component, they also agree not to discuss it until DirecTV says so. It's clearly spelled out in the invitation. Do you really think by ignoring that request you can get into DirecTV's good graces.
Don't beat around the bush I wouldn't expect anything less. But there are certainly better ways to articulate and present your position without the name calling. No....it's not the so called truth that's makes it unprofessional. I am not a moderator at DBStalk, so I cannot and should not have brought up the "banning". However, IMHO they do allow disagreements...plenty of them, but not in the manner in which you presented it. Im sure the values of this country were not established in the tone and the name calling that you have demonstrated.
Im sorry but where did I call anyone a name?
You are correct. My apologies. I will edit my post. I guess "name calling" could be replaced w/ insults.
What I truly don't understand is ... what's the big deal? We're talking about an LNB with SWM capablity. Why would this need to be reviewed and who cares if it is a "premiere" "First Look" or "Exclusive"...?? It is just an LNB!