Well after re-watching many episodes I've concluded the following:
I'm now 100% sure that the real Red died the night of the fire, when little Masha (a.k.a. Liz) shot and killed the real Reddington who was also Lizzie's biological father.
And the bones in the suitcase/bag are real Red's remains.
And I now believe that the Red we've seen since Episode 1 is (drumroll) actually Katerina.
I don't like that idea, not at all, but that's my conclusion, however I feel that writers messed up by indicating since Ep1 this Red has Reddington's fingerprints, in addition to some other "facts" that don't seem to fit.
I don't believe Katerina had any siblings based on that drawing we were shown when Red went thru little Katerina's toys and things.
I'm not particularly convinced that the writers provided sufficient "facts" at least IMO for a twin brother or any brother for Red.
Now I think I missread Bokenkamp, when he was asked about the Rederina theory, I think his reaction which was kinda "What? somebody would have to walk me through it", was to disqualify it and redirect attention to the other theories, which he called logical or something to that effect.
Based on his last comments, I believe that:
The finale will only reveal that the bones belong to the real Red.
And I think Bokenkamp has planned to leave the "So then who is this person who's been impersonating Red'" as the cliff-hanger for a Season 6. He said something like "the truth revealed on the finale will blow up the show, and will completely change the way we will move things going forward"
At this point I wouldn't bet my bottom dollar on another season. Not that I don't want one, But I wouldn't like to entertain high hopes and then receive bad news later on.
Guess We'll have to wait and see.......
I'm now 100% sure that the real Red died the night of the fire, when little Masha (a.k.a. Liz) shot and killed the real Reddington who was also Lizzie's biological father.
And the bones in the suitcase/bag are real Red's remains.
And I now believe that the Red we've seen since Episode 1 is (drumroll) actually Katerina.
I don't like that idea, not at all, but that's my conclusion, however I feel that writers messed up by indicating since Ep1 this Red has Reddington's fingerprints, in addition to some other "facts" that don't seem to fit.
I don't believe Katerina had any siblings based on that drawing we were shown when Red went thru little Katerina's toys and things.
I'm not particularly convinced that the writers provided sufficient "facts" at least IMO for a twin brother or any brother for Red.
Now I think I missread Bokenkamp, when he was asked about the Rederina theory, I think his reaction which was kinda "What? somebody would have to walk me through it", was to disqualify it and redirect attention to the other theories, which he called logical or something to that effect.
Based on his last comments, I believe that:
The finale will only reveal that the bones belong to the real Red.
And I think Bokenkamp has planned to leave the "So then who is this person who's been impersonating Red'" as the cliff-hanger for a Season 6. He said something like "the truth revealed on the finale will blow up the show, and will completely change the way we will move things going forward"
At this point I wouldn't bet my bottom dollar on another season. Not that I don't want one, But I wouldn't like to entertain high hopes and then receive bad news later on.
Guess We'll have to wait and see.......