NCAA Football 2011-2012

I think it is truly remarkable to see a college athlete today that would rather stay in school than go pro because he cares about education. Obviously it is unique since Stanford is better known for academics than football, but it still is remarkable to see. I remember people knocking Luck for staying in school, when he should really be getting praise. More kids should be doing what he is


Ya its all praise good job staying in shcool, until of course he gets hurt and loses out on MILLIONS of dollars... I dont blame any student athlete for leaving there school without graduating to enter the pros.. They will make more money in 1-2 seasons then they would there lifetime anyway with graduating. At least the stars.
 
It is official

ACC adds Pittsburgh, Syracuse from Big East - College Football - Rivals.com

Pittsburgh and Syracuse are headed to the Atlantic Coast Conference.

The ACC announced Sunday that its council of presidents unanimously voted to accept the two schools from the Big East. The move increases the ACC's membership to 14 and sends the Big East scrambling to replace two of its cornerstone programs.

Pittsburgh Chancellor Mark Nordenberg said in a release that the school's leadership "could not envision a better conference home for Pitt."
 
Not even close. The Raiders won as well as the U....simple as that. I did not need "what ifs" like you brought up in the Raider game nor in the game last night. So please go sulk over your Broncos and Buckeyes somewhere else...its old news and tired junior!

Now that's just HILARIOUS!

The selective memory is getting more and more prevalent every day.

YOU are the one that brought up the "what if" (as posted in your original post again, below). I am the one that commented on that. (The post that got deleted)

I am just pointing out another example of the hypocrisy, but we here all know that's old news, don't we, junior? But, you like to throw the blame around.


Again, here is my original post -

This is a concise wrapup of that horrible game.

We gave it away, and the Faiders took it.

And Monday Night games that start at 8:15 suck! We didn't get home until 2AM.

and your reply -

I don't know about the Broncos giving it away because if you take away all the turnovers and half of the penalties, Denver gets shutout 16-0. There was no way they were stop the run because the Denver D-line is undersized.

I will post no more on this particular subject, everyone here will know what I am talking about.
 
Last edited:
yaz96 said:
Now that's just HILARIOUS!

The selective memory is getting more and more prevalent every day.

YOU are the one that brought up the "what if" (as posted in your original post again, below). I am the one that commented on that. (The post that got deleted)

I am just pointing out another example of the hypocrisy, but we here all know that's old news, don't we, junior? But, you like to throw the blame around.

Again, here is your original post -

I will post no more on this particular subject, everyone here will know what I am talking about.

You forgot to post WHY I posted that....how convenient...lol.. Move along son...its over and you lost.
 
I think it is truly remarkable to see a college athlete today that would rather stay in school than go pro because he cares about education. Obviously it is unique since Stanford is better known for academics than football, but it still is remarkable to see. I remember people knocking Luck for staying in school, when he should really be getting praise. More kids should be doing what he is

Ya its all praise good job staying in shcool, until of course he gets hurt and loses out on MILLIONS of dollars... I dont blame any student athlete for leaving there school without graduating to enter the pros.. They will make more money in 1-2 seasons then they would there lifetime anyway with graduating. At least the stars.
Insider, I think you missed the point of Lkr's post. It's about Luck putting education above sports. You don't see that very often and it should be commended. He's probably better off financially, and more intelligent than others, but none the less it's refreshing to see someone arrange their priorities without automatically putting sports first.
 
Expect UConn to be next, maybe just for BB but maybe also football.

I would think we would have gone, at same time, if that was the intention. Leaves me 3 possibilities:

1) We're sticking it out the the BE (noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo)
2) Our ACC invite is conditional on someone being poached first (eg VPI, FSU, Miami, etc)
3) We're holding an invite elsewhere (B10 would not be a shock).
 
The ACC was good yesterday.. FSU played well, Miami did a great job taking down OSU, Clemson looks good can't wait to see them get taken down in Blacksburg in two weeks ;)

Miami has to come thru Blacksburg as well...both games will be good ones to play and I hope both teams are ranked when VT does play them! VT did some nice numbers yesterday against a very good defense that Ark st has..I was impressed how fast they went to that ball.

I pulled hard for FSU...almost got the win but ohh well it was close, they will prob end up dropping a few spots in the polls.

As for the two new teams coming to the ACC... well I would imagin they would stick each one in a division and let it be at that, I don't see the ACC jumping to 16 teams right just yet but stranger things are happening I just hope it isn't Texas or Texas tech...they are not ATLANTIC!!!

ohh and on another note man I had to surf thru several pages here of stuff ..you guys posted alot yesterday while I was at my game and driving home! :p
 
Miami beat an overrated OSU team and is now 1-1. Who do you want them to replace in the poll?

overrated to you or not.... they were still a high ranked team that Miami beat and IMO deserves to be around 25th

As for replacing the poll.... i believe I've made my point clear on how there shouldn't really be a poll till the 5th week but it is what it is.
 
overrated to you or not.... they were still a high ranked team that Miami beat and IMO deserves to be around 25th

As for replacing the poll.... i believe I've made my point clear on how there shouldn't really be a poll till the 5th week but it is what it is.
if you think they deserve to be ranked around 25th, you need to say who you think doesn't deserve to be ranked. Illinois, Georgia Tech, USC, Michigan, and Clemson are all undefeated. TCU's loss came to the #17 team. Miami lost to an unranked team.
 
if you think they deserve to be ranked around 25th, you need to say who you think doesn't deserve to be ranked. Illinois, Georgia Tech, USC, Michigan, and Clemson are all undefeated. TCU's loss came to the #17 team. Miami lost to an unranked team.

Hard question to answer for anyone really.. the polls are all messed up, have been for weeks. There have been teams that have lost to an unranked team in the past and jumped back into the top 25 before from big games like this...no different but just as every year is different so are these cases. I still believe Miami deserves some recognition for getting this far with all that has gone on.
 
Miami does not deserve to be ranked just yet. They beat a good team in Ohio State, whether they are overrated or not will be determined down the road. If Miami keeps winning, they will get their due.

Until then, they can continue flying under the radar.... ;-)
 
I really don't see Texas going to the ACC. It makes no sense for them in any way at all. Why don't they just go independent
 
From Rivals (who knows):

Sources: UT to Pac-12 (2:20 update)

The Pac-12 appears to be working out the final details of a deal that would bring Texas, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and Texas Tech to the conference, sources close to the situation told Hookem.com and the Austin American-Statesman on Sunday morning.
The Board of Regents will vote Monday to authorize Longhorn president Bill Powers to make a decision regarding realignment.

Nothing has been accepted or approved. The deal still needs to be approved by the Pac-12 presidents.

The deal would allow the Longhorns to keep the Longhorn Network. Texas would have to add Pac-12 (soon to be 16) content to the LHN programming. The network would be a combination of Texas and Texas Tech programming.

A high ranking school administrator at one of the four Big 12 schools said, "It's heating up. We're trying to move in that direction (of joining the Pac-12)."

When asked about the terms of the agreement, the administrator said, "We can live with it."

The Longhorns would be able to keep all of their revenue from the network if that amount is greater than one-sixteenth of what the entire Pac-12 receives for its third-tier rights. However, if one-sixteenth of the money the Pac-12 receives from third-tier rights ends up being a larger amount, the schools would divide the revenue evenly and everybody would receive the same amount, the source said.

"Nothing has been definitively confirmed. But that's in the zip code. This is not yet a done deal," a source very familiar with the realignment discussions said Sunday. "It appears that (Pac-12 commissioner) Larry Scott is going to be able to work some magic and help Texas keep the Longhorn Network and their revenue stream."

For football, the conference will be aligned in four four-team pods with Texas being joined by Texas Tech, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State.

Texas will play those schools every year.

How will the overall playing schedule work out for football?

As of right now, the conference is discussing an alignment where teams would play nine conference games. Teams would play every other team in their pod along with two teams from each of the other three pods.

If the Longhorns were in Pod A, they would play the other Pod A teams (Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and Texas Tech) every year. They would also play two teams from Pod B, Pod C and Pod D, bringing the total to nine conference games every year.

It is believed the championship game would be decided by overall conference record, meaning any two teams could play in the championship game on a given year.

According to a high ranking school administrator at one of the four Big 12 schools, the Pac-12 has said it will limit the extra-long trips to one per year for every team.

Texas president Bill Powers and athletic directors DeLoss Dodds and Chris Plonsky flew back to Austin from Los Angeles late Saturday night after watching Texas beat UCLA 49-20 in Pasadena on Saturday.

The Longhorn administrators did not meet face to face with Scott while in California this weekend, a source very familiar with the realignment discussions said, but, "It feels like the discussions among the parties are entering a more productive phase."

Another well-placed source close to the situation said they expect that the Texas Board of Regents will vote Monday to authorize Longhorn president Bill Powers to make a decision regarding realignment.
 
Miami does not deserve to be ranked just yet. They beat a good team in Ohio State, whether they are overrated or not will be determined down the road. If Miami keeps winning, they will get their due.

Until then, they can continue flying under the radar.... ;-)

I think they will slip in to 25th or so after this week... I'm hoping for it as they play VT in 3 weeks - at Lane ;)


also i'd rather texas schools stay away from the ACC...makes no sense. To be honest it makes no sense they going to the PAC 12 either as it hurts fan travel IMO.
 
I don't.

I have a feeling the ACC has already been talking with Texas & Texas Tech and will go to 16, with 4 pods of 4 teams each.

They are speculating, lets face it until it's a done deal that is all it is, that UConn and either WVU or Texas will go to the ACC. I think UConn will benefit to move to the ACC instead of waiting out the Big East.
 

Big East Expansion?

When will Ohio State get the final resolution from the NCAA?

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts

Top