Kind of like how some of us feel about 1-1 hockey or soccer games. Some find it exciting, some find it boring. Based on your interests.It's not about offense or defense. It's about being an interesting game.
Sandra
Last edited:
Kind of like how some of us feel about 1-1 hockey or soccer games. Some find it exciting, some find it boring. Based on your interests.It's not about offense or defense. It's about being an interesting game.
Sandra
Exactly.Kind of like how some of us feel about 1-1 hockey or soccer games. Some find it exciting, some find it boring. Based on your interests.
Also largely based on if you are a fan of one of the teams. I bet the odds are pretty good she has been riveted to 1-0 games where her favorite teams are involved, then called it a great pitching duel, great goal play, etc. Bet she wasn't thinking about hari-kari with a butter knife then.Exactly.
To be honest, it doesnt matter the score in either of those two sports. They bore me to tears.
Also largely based on if you are a fan of one of the teams. I bet the odds are pretty good she has been riveted to 1-0 games where her favorite teams are involved, then called it a great pitching duel, great goal play, etc. Bet she wasn't thinking about hari-kari with a butter knife then.
You wouldn't hear near this much bitching about such a boring game form people if it was one of their teams playing.
I'm sorry you didn't enjoy it. Some of us did.I have the MLB, NFL, NBA, NFL and college basketball packages with DirecTV. I watch games that my teams are not playing in ALL the time. It's what we do.
I've seen many exciting high scoring and low scoring games in all sports. It's not about that.
I'm sorry...that football game was just boring for me no matter how you rationalize it. I wish it wasn't. And I do NOT want to see a rematch in a championship game.
Sandra
I'm sorry you didn't enjoy it. Some of us did.
I agree. I do wish LSU's offense was better.I'm glad you did. Mine is just one person's opinion. I do think these may be the two best teams. Their defenses were dominant.
Sandra
Somebody posted this on an LSU fan site. Thought it was kind of funny...and creative. Chizik next to the Bama fan made me laugh. Sorry Smith.
I heard that people were saying if Luck was in the SEC he wouldn't be as good, well I think he would be better. He would have better WRs and a better O Line plus his defense would need him to win the games all the time.
I bet Alabama or LSU would live to have him.
Sent from my Galaxy using SatelliteGuys
I agree too, especially the bold part.I heard that people were saying if Luck was in the SEC he wouldn't be as good, well I think he would be better. He would have better WRs and a better O Line plus his defense would need him to win the games all the time.
I bet Alabama or LSU would live to have him.
Somebody posted this on an LSU fan site. Thought it was kind of funny...and creative. Chizik next to the Bama fan made me laugh. Sorry Smith.
Since you're here, how's UConn doing? Bowl eligible yet?That was the "game of the century," all right - the 19th century.
Neither of those teams could recruit an overhyped 5* ZOMG place kicker? Alabama even has 2 crappy ones? Wow.
Since you're here, how's UConn doing? Bowl eligible yet?
You seemed stressed. Let me help you out. This is what Hancox posted:Really? why turn what he said back onto UConn when this is the SEC football thread? I don't get you guys...you won't stick to the subject but when someone is critical of your awesome SEC teams you get all bent.... he's not trolling, he's making a pretty good and pretty typical opinion of the gameif you ask me but then again I've already said what needed to be said and that is I pulled for LSU and they won.. good job, still a over hyped game and boring to boot.
That was the "game of the century," all right - the 19th century.
Neither of those teams could recruit an overhyped 5* ZOMG place kicker? Alabama even has 2 crappy ones? Wow.