War is hell...
Bethesda's VP of PR and Marketing was "surprised" at how much people liked the single player part of Doom 4.
http://www.videogamer.com/ps4/doom_...ow_much_people_liked_dooms_single-player.html
That's REALLY sad if you think about it. It shows how out of touch he (and probably others) are. You don't want PR and Marketing to NOT KNOW their market!
What I take more issue with is that he didn't think that people would like a game where you, as Angry Joe put it "Go Down to Hell and Punch Satan in the D*ck" wouldn't be fun. I mean given the success of the Wolfenstein games you'd think he'd expect that people would like a more intense version of that. It's people like this that make the decisions as to what games are made and what are not. That's why the last gen was swamped with Gunmetal Grey/CoD Ripoff games, because people in marketing just looked at how successful CoD was and assumed people wanted more of that. It's like they forgot what made the genre popular in the first place, which was colorful power fantasy one-man army types of games. It would be like if, due to the success of Chipotle, 95% of new Mexican restaurants opened were clones of that. I'm not saying CoD and "realistic military shooters" don't deserve a place at the table, but they also shouldn't be the only choice at the buffet. It's only recently that we've seen a shift to other art and game styles such as Overwatch, Borderlands, and Titanfall. We can only hope that now we can move back to an emphasis on true "Fun" gameplay.Well, they definitely marketed the multiplayer portion more than they probably should have. The pre-order bonuses were all unlocks for multiplayer and they had a big push around their open multiplayer beta. They also tried to push their season pass that was all multiplayer content pretty hard at release.
After playing it, I don't think the multiplayer was bad but it also wasn't anything special. I think most people would have been completely fine with it if Bethesda followed Wolfenstein's lead and just didn't include multiplayer. I wouldn't be surprised to see them do that whenever they make another Doom sequel.
If you are at Bethesda and play the single-player, you might think it's really fun and different. But you don't know if you're drinking your own kool-aid... is it really fun? Or are people going to play it and dislike the fact there's no voiced protagonist, or the fact there's no real story, and will they say: 'id Software hasn't got out of the 1990s. Same old, same old. 6/10'. You never know which of those two scenarios you'll end up getting.
According to a source, Battleborn will be F2P in the near future
http://kotaku.com/source-battleborn...m_source=Kotaku_Twitter&utm_medium=Socialflow