many xp's are just too weak to run these up grades without more RAM, if that's a option.They had a $45 upgrade promotion when win 8 came out... I bet a lot wish they had taken advantage of that...
many xp's are just too weak to run these up grades without more RAM, if that's a option.They had a $45 upgrade promotion when win 8 came out... I bet a lot wish they had taken advantage of that...
Probably not a concern to commercial sites. My company has site licenses. It is more a matter of configuration support, lost productivity during transition and a need to grow the tech savvy of the company.
As an example. Current laptop has a PCMCIA slot. New ones don't. Usually not a big deal, but the product I just shipped uses PCMCIA flash devices as the primary transfer media. So any new laptop also has to include an external PCMCIA reader for every laptop on that program. The industrial world does not move nearly as fast as the PC world does and that PCMCIA memory got locked in to the specs nearly 10 years ago.
They had a $45 upgrade promotion when win 8 came out... I bet a lot wish they had taken advantage of that...
What bullet? There is nothing wrong with Windows 8. If people need start menu functionality restored there are free downloads that accomplish this.And I'll bet even more are happy they dodged the bullet. I'll bet a lot of upgrades from XP were put off because MS delayed it before, and they counted on MS delaying it again.
...and nothing you said has anything to do with why I'm keeping my WinXP.What bullet? There is nothing wrong with Windows 8. If people need start menu functionality restored there are free downloads that accomplish this.
For the love of Pete, all this Windows 8 bashing is ridiculous. A typical windows upgrade before 8 was $100+. I got 8 for under $50 and then paid $3 at the time to add start menu functionality back to it. Less than 1/2 my normal OS update cost, improved performance, and only the slight hassle of having to download a third party program to add functionality that I liked back in.
Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
I already did, and logged into satguys with it. (FF 2.0)In honor of this momentous day, I'm going to boot up my Win98 machine that hasn't seen action since about 2008.
Not to mention the free upgrade to 8.1 and now the next 8.1 version (like an R2). Who knows MS may throw in an 8.2 free upgrade too to try to recover from the bad press of 8.0.
In honor of this momentous day, I'm going to boot up my Win98 machine that hasn't seen action since about 2008.
Not to mention the free upgrade to 8.1 and now the next 8.1 version (like an R2). Who knows MS may throw in an 8.2 free upgrade too to try to recover from the bad press of 8.0.
At Microsoft, quality is job .1
I thought about creating a new thread on this, but on a related note...
Zap2It has now switched their website guide over to the slower, clunkier, less functional metro-style interface.
My post wasn't a response to you....and nothing you said has anything to do with why I'm keeping my WinXP.
...What bullet? There is nothing wrong with Windows 8...." Sales say otherwise. "...I got 8 for under $50..." And you don't wonder WHY? November Sierra Sierra.
No, but the generalized response of "all this bashing" drew many of us XP holdouts into the fray of your argument.My post wasn't a response to you.
At the same time, its not like Microsoft made a compelling case for upgrading. It shouldn't be necessary to have that kind of computing power to do the little things what most want to do.Its not like this date was a surprise.
...and its locked-down, dumbed-down (in the name of security) shoe-horned-tablet-picture-book-OS-into-a-desktop is useless for power users and IT professionals. A start button or lack thereof has nothing to do with it.Sales don't mean anything with regards to quality. Microsoft ended up with a huge PR nightmare, tempest in a teapot style, over the lack of a start button. That rather than lack of quality has hampered windows 8 sales.