MLB 2013 Season

Does he have enough at bats to qualify for the batting title?

He won't make it to the requisite 501 plate appearances (scheduled team games x 3.1). He has 168 plate appearances in 44 games in which he came to the plate (he also pinch ran for Ortiz in a late inning on what was supposed to be an off-day), and he has only been pinch hit for twice (costing him five plate appearances, total), so his average of 3.82 plate appearances per game is a reasonable basis for extrapolation that he might finish the season with 443 plate appearances if he continues to bat 9th and plays in all 72 remaining games. Moving him to leadoff would tend to get him 8/9ths of an additional plate appearance per game, or 64 more for a projected total of 507, but that ain't gonna happen, and he isn't going to hit .300. His average finally dropped below .400 last night.
 
Does he have enough at bats to qualify for the batting title?

He doesn't yet, but what's remarkable about this kid is he was a great glove/no bat prospect. The Sox would have been very pleased with .250 and great defense at either SS or 3B, and now he's hitting .395! Realistically, if he can hit .280-.290 I would be thrilled. And, at 23, this kid is only going to get better.
 
He doesn't yet, but what's remarkable about this kid is he was a great glove/no bat prospect. The Sox would have been very pleased with .250 and great defense at either SS or 3B, and now he's hitting .395! Realistically, if he can hit .280-.290 I would be thrilled. And, at 23, this kid is only going to get better.

Just read an interesting online article about Iglesias, with some likely reasons for his offensive improvements. Here's a key one, IMO:

Prior to this season, Iglesias had some success handling pitches inside and up-and-away, but he was basically an automatic out for pitchers who could locate the ball down in the zone away. This season has been a different story. Iglesias is still seeing pitches low-and-away more than anywhere else, but instead of making weak ground ball contact, he has begun to square up these pitches and hit them to the opposite field with some authority. His line drive rates on these pitches are up and while he still hits plenty of them on the ground, that contact is of a much less weak variety. He has hit .410 on balls hit to right field this season, after hitting just .111 going the other way last year.

The Red Sox have one hitter who is particularly adept at going the other way with low-and-away offerings from the right side and his influence on Iglesias may be one important factor in this new-found effectiveness against these pitches. Dustin Pedroia took Iglesias under his wing after last season, inviting him to work out in his Arizona home and teaching him to play pepper. Pedroia talked about those training sessions with Peter Gammons, explaining that he told Iglesias:

"There is no way, in life, that you have hand-eye coordination like that and you can't hit. That's impossible. You just need to use it."

http://www.overthemonster.com/2013/7/8/4503158/jose-iglesias-red-sox-shortstop-stephen-drew
 
Dodgers turning into the Yankees ?

Buying anyone they want ... :rolleyes:

Ricky Nolasco is a nice piece for a team chasing a pennant, but he isn't exactly Felix Hernandez, Justin Verlander or even Cliff Lee. Not sure how Nolasco turns a team into "buying anyone they want".
 
...now he's hitting .395!...

I just checked, and today's Red Sox game hasn't started yet, so "now" he isn't hitting anything, and he won't be hitting until he steps into the batters box, and even then, he won't be hitting until he hits, but that is instantaneous, since he will have hit the instant the ball leaves his bat. It is like the old question, "Where was the man when he jumped off the bridge?" Any attempted answer describes where he was either before or after he jumped.

Inglesias isn't "hitting" .395. He has hit .395. He is not a jar of 1000 balls with 395 of them marked with an "H", that the team draws from when he has an at-bat. If you want a professional assessment of what he is "hitting", then get Vegas to estabish a betting line for each succesive Iglesias at-bat. The smart money for his next at bat would even out at less than .300. I remember when Jose Offerman began the season "hitting" .360, then, when he stunk, supporters would say "well, he's still hitting .320" and then "he's still hitting .300", until they said, "well, at least now, he's someone else's problem". I made similar comments here two years ago when Josh Reddick was "hitting" about .360. I predicted that he would wind up at about .280, which he did, but one thing to remember is that he didn't wind up the year having hit .280 by hitting .280 over the remainder of the season; he wound up at .280 by hitting about .200 over the remainder of the season.

A few weeks ago, someone had analyzed Iglesias's percentage of balls hit in play that found grass instead of gloves and it was a percentage that belonged in Ripley's Believe It or Not, which means it is not sustainable.
 
Ricky Nolasco is a nice piece for a team chasing a pennant, but he isn't exactly Felix Hernandez, Justin Verlander or even Cliff Lee. Not sure how Nolasco turns a team into "buying anyone they want".

Ricky will solidify the back end of the roation. Ricky WAS/IS an workhorse and a innings eater....something every team needs. The Dodgers now have a starting 4 that is as good as anyone in the Majors right now(Kershaw, Greinke, Ryu and Nolasco). Ricky was never a #1 starter or even a #2. Those 3 guys you mentioned are top of the rotation type guys and the Dodgers already had that.
 
Ricky will solidify the back end of the roation. Ricky WAS/IS an workhorse and a innings eater....something every team needs. The Dodgers now have a starting 4 that is as good as anyone in the Majors right now(Kershaw, Greinke, Ryu and Nolasco). Ricky was never a #1 starter or even a #2. Those 3 guys you mentioned are top of the rotation type guys and the Dodgers already had that.

I agree, but the context of my comment was for the "buying anyone they want" comment, not an indictment on the Dodgers rotation.
 
I just checked, and today's Red Sox game hasn't started yet, so "now" he isn't hitting anything, and he won't be hitting until he steps into the batters box, and even then, he won't be hitting until he hits, but that is instantaneous, since he will have hit the instant the ball leaves his bat. It is like the old question, "Where was the man when he jumped off the bridge?" Any attempted answer describes where he was either before or after he jumped.

Inglesias isn't "hitting" .395. He has hit .395. He is not a jar of 1000 balls with 395 of them marked with an "H", that the team draws from when he has an at-bat. If you want a professional assessment of what he is "hitting", then get Vegas to estabish a betting line for each succesive Iglesias at-bat. The smart money for his next at bat would even out at less than .300. I remember when Jose Offerman began the season "hitting" .360, then, when he stunk, supporters would say "well, he's still hitting .320" and then "he's still hitting .300", until they said, "well, at least now, he's someone else's problem". I made similar comments here two years ago when Josh Reddick was "hitting" about .360. I predicted that he would wind up at about .280, which he did, but one thing to remember is that he didn't wind up the year having hit .280 by hitting .280 over the remainder of the season; he wound up at .280 by hitting about .200 over the remainder of the season.

A few weeks ago, someone had analyzed Iglesias's percentage of balls hit in play that found grass instead of gloves and it was a percentage that belonged in Ripley's Believe It or Not, which means it is not sustainable.

I'm sorry, it will never happen again! :eek:
 
I guess it is a good thing the Dodgers have 4 outfielders. Right when Crawford comes off the DL, Kemp goes back on it. The only everyday position player that has not been on the DL for the Dodgers is Ethier.

Sent from my Jailbroken iPhone 5 using SatelliteGuys
 
It is also a good thing the Dodgers traded for another starter to give them 6 when they picked up Nolasco. Right when they get Nolasco, Fife goes on the DL.

Sent from my Jailbroken iPhone 5 using SatelliteGuys
 
I agree, but the context of my comment was for the "buying anyone they want" comment, not an indictment on the Dodgers rotation.

Didn't take it that way. I think people sometimes thinks a trade by contender is usually thought of as needing an ace or a big bat, when sometimes the not so big trade is the one that usually puts you over.


Posted Using The New SatelliteGuys Reader App!
 

Oklahoma State basketball legend Bob Kurland dies at 88

L.C. Greenwood RIP

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts