Hello. I am a long time Dish customer who is extremely happy with my old 622.
A few years back my gf's folks wanted to get rid of Comcast TV and saw a well-priced promotion for ATT U-verse, which was pretty much brand new at the time. It wasn't around long enough for me to hear about some of the horror stories people would later have with it so, just based on price and value, I told them it could work out very well for them. Wow was I wrong. I've never heard of more downtime for modern day utility, period. The price is also around $250/mo for voice, internet, and TV, way up from the initial $129.99 promotional price. The last straw for them was yesterday when all 3 services went down for most of the day, only to be told "yes, we can see that there are upgrades happening in your area" and that they can't get a tech out there until Friday to return service to the house. No phone, no internet, no TV, and certainly no giving a damn about the customer.
So naturally I thought to recommend Dish for their TV needs only to discover the new Hopper works in a similar way to how the TV aspect of U-Verse worked with a master receiver and slave receivers. What I'm here to ask is how similar does the Hopper work to U-Verse as far as streaming protocol, etc. and if I'm crazy to even suggest they go with one considering the horrible experience they are trying to escape.
The review I read seemed to indicate an exceedingly successful release, however, if anyone expects that they might have similar issues with the Hopper I might insist they go with separate receivers for all rooms. They do want TV in 4 rooms (maybe even 5 if there was an easy way to do it) but might only need HD in 3, and DVR in up to 3, so I'm not sure if that would be too cost prohibitive to have say two 722ks, and two 612s instead. The monthly costs would basically be a wash as DVR+Hopper+3 Joeys is $31 and my account with a 622 and 612 is $16 so for two of each it might be $32. Does one still have to pay $200 lease fees for the receivers?
Any guidance in this matter is appreciated. Thanks
A few years back my gf's folks wanted to get rid of Comcast TV and saw a well-priced promotion for ATT U-verse, which was pretty much brand new at the time. It wasn't around long enough for me to hear about some of the horror stories people would later have with it so, just based on price and value, I told them it could work out very well for them. Wow was I wrong. I've never heard of more downtime for modern day utility, period. The price is also around $250/mo for voice, internet, and TV, way up from the initial $129.99 promotional price. The last straw for them was yesterday when all 3 services went down for most of the day, only to be told "yes, we can see that there are upgrades happening in your area" and that they can't get a tech out there until Friday to return service to the house. No phone, no internet, no TV, and certainly no giving a damn about the customer.
So naturally I thought to recommend Dish for their TV needs only to discover the new Hopper works in a similar way to how the TV aspect of U-Verse worked with a master receiver and slave receivers. What I'm here to ask is how similar does the Hopper work to U-Verse as far as streaming protocol, etc. and if I'm crazy to even suggest they go with one considering the horrible experience they are trying to escape.
The review I read seemed to indicate an exceedingly successful release, however, if anyone expects that they might have similar issues with the Hopper I might insist they go with separate receivers for all rooms. They do want TV in 4 rooms (maybe even 5 if there was an easy way to do it) but might only need HD in 3, and DVR in up to 3, so I'm not sure if that would be too cost prohibitive to have say two 722ks, and two 612s instead. The monthly costs would basically be a wash as DVR+Hopper+3 Joeys is $31 and my account with a 622 and 612 is $16 so for two of each it might be $32. Does one still have to pay $200 lease fees for the receivers?
Any guidance in this matter is appreciated. Thanks