2011-12 NFL Playoffs

Status
Not open for further replies.
Horseface or did you mean hawkface? That's new. But anyway, I am quite positive that Smith will be a keeper for at least another season until he proves otherwise. How can you get rid of a qb that brought this far in the playoffs? That will be irrational if not insane.

In case you didn't know it already,"Horseface" is John Elway. I tell you what,change the QB,coach,front office,owner,& the Broncos seem to stay the same anyway. While it'd be easy to blame Tebow for Saturday night's loss,I've seen John Elway also stink up the joint too. I remember when the 49ers beat the Broncos in the Super Bowl(don't ask what the number was,I just know that it was played in January 1990) 55-10,the joke afterwards was "Speed Limit 55 Broncos 10."
 
b24db60158466ab4cd176701ff21d68e.jpg

[knock,knock,knock] HEY RODGERS,DISCOUNT DOUBLE CHECK AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!! Clay Matthews,ARGHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!

HEY RODGERS.....................
 
In case you didn't know it already,"Horseface" is John Elway. I tell you what,change the QB,coach,front office,owner,& the Broncos seem to stay the same anyway. While it'd be easy to blame Tebow for Saturday night's loss,I've seen John Elway also stink up the joint too. I remember when the 49ers beat the Broncos in the Super Bowl(don't ask what the number was,I just know that it was played in January 1990) 55-10,the joke afterwards was "Speed Limit 55 Broncos 10."

Thank you. I didn't know that. That is so hilarious. BTW it was superbowl XXIV. I have a very vague recollection of that game.
 
New Orleans @ San Francisco- A classic offense vs. defensive match-up. All I keep hearing about is how New Orleans isn't the same team outside of the Superdome. I suppose that's a fair way in justifying a possible win by San Francisco. But I don't buy it. At all. In order for the Niners to win, they'd have to hold the Saints to under 20 points. And I just don't see that happening. The Niners were a good story this year, but the Saints roll in this one. Easily.

Denver @ New England- If any coach can come up with a game plan to neutralize Tebow, it's Bill Belichick. I don't see his staff conducting the same mistakes as Dick LeBeau did a week ago. The only thing making this game close though, would be that New England might not have the personnel to implement Belichick's plan the way he's envisioned. Denver has the defense and run game to make this a close one, however I think the difference maker in this game will be Terrific Tom Brady. It's hard to imagine Tom not being able to counter whatever Denver throws at him. Sorry Teboners. The T-Train stops here.

Houston @ Baltimore- This game will be closer than most people are forecasting. Neither QB is a difference maker. Flacco has regressed this year as a QB. And Yates is a backup's backup rookie. The game will come down to defense and running the ball. A very old school game. Brain Cushing and DeMeco Ryan vs. Ray Lewis and T-Sizzle. Arian Foster vs. Ray Rice. For those who are disappointed the Steelers didn't get a rematch at Baltimore in the playoffs, watch this one. It'll be a similar type of game. I like Baltimore in a close one.

Giants @ Green Bay- Flurries expected through the weekend with 4-6" of fresh snow arriving tomorrow. At the Historic Frozen Tundra of Lambeau Field. The well rested 15-1 Packers versus the playing-as-well-as-they've-been-all-year New York Football Giants. The front 4 on the Giants will put pressure on Aaron Rodgers. That much is certain. Enough so to make it interesting. But it won't make a difference. He's Aaron freaking Rodgers after all. The undisputed best QB in the league right now. Rest or rust, it won't matter. Eli Manning has had a very under-appreciated year and has emerged as one of the NFL's elite. The New York media and others are giving the Giants WAY too much of a chance in this one. And I think it's a trap. A sucker's bet if you will. I don't see how Green Bay loses this one. They win by at least 2 TD's and continue their march to become one of the few back-to-back Super Bowl champions.

Looking back on my predictions last week....

New Orleans @ San Francisco- The Niners DIDN'T hold the Saints to under 20 points and still won. Not by defense, but through offense. And by a clutch throw by Alex Smith. Who could've possible imagined the way this game finished? Wow. Instant classic. Congrats San Fran. This was the game of the weekend IMO.

Denver @ New England- An absolute blowout. Sort of embarrassing actually. A team this far into the playoffs shouldn't have been blown out like that. Was Denver an illusion all along?

Houston @ Baltimore- It certainly did come down to defense and running the ball. But with one more caveat. Turnovers.

Giants @ Green Bay- Boy was I wrong. And Packers fan, please don't use the "rust" because of rest excuse. It's lazy. Every other home team (ie. team with bye week 1) won their game this weekend... except for the Packers.

It's simple, but all of the games really came down to one simple thing: Turnovers. Teams with more turnovers than their opponent lost. (With exception to the Pats/Broncs game. That game was certainly an anomaly that can't be compared to anything else).

New Orleans had 5, San Fran had 1
Houston had 4, Baltimore had 0
Green Bay had 4, NY Giants had 1

Turn the ball over, you lose. It's that simple.
 
You have to wonder if the Texans would be playing better if they had Matt Schaub or even Matt Leinart playing as QB or if QB is just another interchangeable part to them.

It's hard to imagine them NOT being in a better position to win.

It was amazing in and of itself to see the Texans go this far with their THIRD string QB and without their best defensive player (Mario Williams).

Once this team get's healthy, I can see the Texans as being the favorite to come out of the AFC in 2012.
 
Not surprised at all about this game. The giants usually step it up when they enter the playoffs and have proven they fear no one.Of course the drops and to's by GB doesn't help either.

Is it time for New York fans to stop calling for Tom Coughlin's head? It seems like he's on the hot seat every year. Yet when his team get's into the playoffs, they're practically unbeatable. Face it, he's a good coach! Good coaches are hard to find.
 
Is it time for New York fans to stop calling for Tom Coughlin's head? It seems like he's on the hot seat every year. Yet when his team get's into the playoffs, they're practically unbeatable. Face it, he's a good coach! Good coaches are hard to find.

I agree. Coughlin won at BC, won in Jacksonville and he certainly has won in NY. VERY underappreciated coach.
 
The Ravens are only 1-6 all time versus the Patriots, but that win was two years ago in Foxborough in the Wild Card round.
 
Looking back on my predictions last week....

New Orleans @ San Francisco- The Niners DIDN'T hold the Saints to under 20 points and still won. Not by defense, but through offense. And by a clutch throw by Alex Smith. Who could've possible imagined the way this game finished? Wow. Instant classic. Congrats San Fran. This was the game of the weekend IMO.

Denver @ New England- An absolute blowout. Sort of embarrassing actually. A team this far into the playoffs shouldn't have been blown out like that. Was Denver an illusion all along?

Houston @ Baltimore- It certainly did come down to defense and running the ball. But with one more caveat. Turnovers.

Giants @ Green Bay- Boy was I wrong. And Packers fan, please don't use the "rust" because of rest excuse. It's lazy. Every other home team (ie. team with bye week 1) won their game this weekend... except for the Packers.

It's simple, but all of the games really came down to one simple thing: Turnovers. Teams with more turnovers than their opponent lost. (With exception to the Pats/Broncs game. That game was certainly an anomaly that can't be compared to anything else).

New Orleans had 5, San Fran had 1
Houston had 4, Baltimore had 0
Green Bay had 4, NY Giants had 1

Turn the ball over, you lose. It's that simple.

A few years ago one of my girlfriends was going to a party where there would be a lot of guys...including one she wanted to impress. She asked me to teach her about sports so she wouldn't sound like an idiot.

Instead of filling her head with my stupid propoganda - which she wouldn't have remembered anyway - I told her to remember only two things:

1. If they talk about baseball, and she heard someone say the word 'pitcher', she should say 'you can never have too much pitching'.

2. If they talk about football, and she heard someone say turnover, fumble or interception, she should shake her head and say 'turnovers will kill ya'.

I told her any man who knows anything would nod in agreement and marvel over how such a pretty girl could be so insightful about sports!

True story


Sandra
 
That was actually proven a month ago in Denver. Only the truly devoted thought the Broncos had a chance last night.


Not really, because a month ago when they played the Broncos were close. If not for the unusual turnovers it was a ball game. This weekend however was a complete and utter beat down on both sides of the ball.
 
A few years ago one of my girlfriends was going to a party where there would be a lot of guys...including one she wanted to impress. She asked me to teach her about sports so she wouldn't sound like an idiot.

Instead of filling her head with my stupid propoganda - which she wouldn't have remembered anyway - I told her to remember only two things:

1. If they talk about baseball, and she heard someone say the word 'pitcher', she should say 'you can never have too much pitching'.

2. If they talk about football, and she heard someone say turnover, fumble or interception, she should shake her head and say 'turnovers will kill ya'.

I told her any man who knows anything would nod in agreement and marvel over how such a pretty girl could be so insightful about sports!

True story


Sandra

Hopefully they weren't serving pitchers of beer and turnovers at that party, or it could have got very confusing.

Then again, "you can never have enough pitchers" and "turnovers will kill ya" can work both ways in a double entendre. :p
 
Looking back on my predictions last week....

New Orleans @ San Francisco- The Niners DIDN'T hold the Saints to under 20 points and still won. Not by defense, but through offense. And by a clutch throw by Alex Smith. Who could've possible imagined the way this game finished? Wow. Instant classic. Congrats San Fran. This was the game of the weekend IMO.

Denver @ New England- An absolute blowout. Sort of embarrassing actually. A team this far into the playoffs shouldn't have been blown out like that. Was Denver an illusion all along?

Houston @ Baltimore- It certainly did come down to defense and running the ball. But with one more caveat. Turnovers.

Giants @ Green Bay- Boy was I wrong. And Packers fan, please don't use the "rust" because of rest excuse. It's lazy. Every other home team (ie. team with bye week 1) won their game this weekend... except for the Packers.

It's simple, but all of the games really came down to one simple thing: Turnovers. Teams with more turnovers than their opponent lost. (With exception to the Pats/Broncs game. That game was certainly an anomaly that can't be compared to anything else).

New Orleans had 5, San Fran had 1
Houston had 4, Baltimore had 0
Green Bay had 4, NY Giants had 1

Turn the ball over, you lose. It's that simple.

re SF vs NO:

Three forced fumbles and two interceptions. If you look at the game in its totality, it was the defense that really won this game for SF. If you look at the whole season, it was the defense who brought this team this far.
 
re SF vs NO:

Three forced fumbles and two interceptions. If you look at the game in its totality, it was the defense that really won this game for SF. If you look at the whole season, it was the defense who brought this team this far.

There were 4 offensive lead changes in the last 4 minutes. While you can probably credit San Fran's defense for creating 5 New Orleans' turnovers, it was the offense that won the game.
 
How about both? The defense in the first half and the offense in that last quarter. Nobody gives them credit (nationally) but this is a complete team with the defense being our strength. Let's go Niners!
 
Possible Super matchups:

Patriots-49ers: 80's vs. 00's, defense vs. offense, Brady plays his hometown team

Patiots-Giants: rematch from SB 42

Ravens-49ers- Harbaugh brothers

Ravens-Giants- rematch from SB 35


Another interesting angle for a potential Pats-Niners matchup: Brady would be trying to equal his childhood idol (and Terry Bradshaw) for Super Bowl rings.
 
Stat of the day: With yesterday's win, Eli Manning is now tied with the most road playoff wins in NFL history. A win next week put's him in the history books. So, yes Eli, you can now be called "elite". We're sorry for underestimating you.
 
Is it time for New York fans to stop calling for Tom Coughlin's head? It seems like he's on the hot seat every year. Yet when his team get's into the playoffs, they're practically unbeatable. Face it, he's a good coach! Good coaches are hard to find.

Furthermore, since taking over the Head Coaching position for the New York Giants, the Giants have had a winning record EVERY single year Coughlin has coached the Giants except one (Eli Manning's rookie year). Meaning, his Giants have been in the playoffs or the playoff hunt each year he's coached.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Finally, the fight I WANTED: Cotto vs. Mayweather!

Namath

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts