I am confused as to why Dish, VOOM and even cable will let consumers use the service WITHOUT a year commitment, and Direct TV requires it.
I have been reading everything posted on these message boards that indicate Direct TV is much more superior to the others (in picture quality, customer service.....and on and on). Seems to me that if Direct TV was really that much better than the others, they would NOT require any forced commitment. Once the consumer gets Direct TV, they should be able to see for themselves how much better it is over Dish, VOOM or cable and never want to leave.
It seems (at least from a marketing standpoint), Dierct TV would like to get into as many homes as possible and have the service speak for itself. Where as if Dish and VOOM are really that bad, THEY would be the ones to force a commitment on the consumers (to trap them into something inferior for a period of time).
Seems a little backwards to me.
Kinda like if Mercedes started giving test drives of the 300S away for free, while Yugo was charging $25 to test drive one of their cars.
I have been reading everything posted on these message boards that indicate Direct TV is much more superior to the others (in picture quality, customer service.....and on and on). Seems to me that if Direct TV was really that much better than the others, they would NOT require any forced commitment. Once the consumer gets Direct TV, they should be able to see for themselves how much better it is over Dish, VOOM or cable and never want to leave.
It seems (at least from a marketing standpoint), Dierct TV would like to get into as many homes as possible and have the service speak for itself. Where as if Dish and VOOM are really that bad, THEY would be the ones to force a commitment on the consumers (to trap them into something inferior for a period of time).
Seems a little backwards to me.
Kinda like if Mercedes started giving test drives of the 300S away for free, while Yugo was charging $25 to test drive one of their cars.