I considered not wasting any further effort on this but apparently there are some misconceptions..........
SO.........
I'm not the one with the perception problem, nor am I spreading anything, including lies or bullsh*t. NOTE: Usually NOT a good idea to infer someone is a liar....
The initial (VERY FIRST) statement was that a service was to be launched to bring "back to service" the glut of DVB receivers AND DISHES that were not being used for "FTA" anymore.....We all know what that "FTA" means......
AND DISHES.....when queried about that, the 1st response was yes the 18-20" DN/DTV dish. After being "called" on it and I'm sure some hurry up research into legal FTA requirements, the re-released specs were modified to say 30" but more if you want the best signal. (Well DUH Homer! Why was an 18-20" ever even considered viable for non DBS reception?) I never got then, or have seen since, the polarization question answered. Remember?....there were numerous posts speculating about which DBS (circular) bird it could be? Like Charlie is going to share.....lol Believe me, I payed very close attention to this topic as it gives key indications of where it would not be (Echo birds), and to the technical savvy of those making the statements.
Then the suggestions from posters migrated to MPEG4 and why not do that with all it's benifits...........and suddenly it's all about MPEG4...........then once it was realized that that is inconsistant with the original scope, that was retracted for the current "in a year or so" position. (why didnt they have the technical expertise to know that before jumping on the MPEG4 wagon to begin with?)
Now, let's move to all the "closed contract" announcements ..........well, not a lot to say except if a contract is closed then a finite timetable
is established. Who believes that anyone would sign a contract that contains a "When we get around to it" clause...........
:
True, I have never started a business from scratch of the magnitude that this venture would require (clearly neither have they....) however, I have been associated with intimate details of intra-business commerce and structure, and I can tell you that this line is FAR from what would be necessary to upstart anything, much less maintain any standing in the business community.
And again I say who cares about streaming anything here? Is this not a SATELLITE FORUM? The only context that has any bearing here for it to highlight that there is NO satellite signal, yet they are giving more that due consideration to an alternative distribution medium. Even factoring in that this area is thankfully very broad regarding OT posts, anything beyond that technically belongs at A/V forums or some other place besides FTA, especially considering the nature of this thread.
My choice of adjective describing my personal opinion of the "In your Facebook, Tweet this, Gotta have my U-BOOB fix, chatcrap, Skyper mentality of the garden variety HS "surfer" may have been a bit coarse. Streaming A/V over IP vs via satellite got lumped into that group. It's like OMG, like turn that crap off and get a life, fur sure........totally.....
Uh, I didnt. I reiterate, I am not the one with the perception problem....
Is English you 1st language? I feel certain that I made it clear that I have no complaint or gripe that the service doesnt exist, I am simply pointing out why, In my opinion that is has not come to pass....AKA calling BULLSH*T. I cant even say "I 'hope' I'm wrong" because I just dont believe it anymore. I'd love to be wrong about it, that would be great. I've clearly stated that as well. I just dont believe it and refuse to pussyfoot around when discussing it. If it comes to pass great, I'd love it, and would be tempted to support some premium extras, yet with the business model I've seen to date I cant see going there. In the plainest language I can find to express this, If this is indeed not a "15 minutes of Fame" that has well run it's course, I do not believe these guys have a friggin clue what they are doing. One could say "Time will Tell" yet 6 months hasnt told anything......Well then again maybe it has...........
Now to this..........
I'm pretty sure my post could be categorized as a "Naysayer" so you did in fact reference my post.
I believe I've covered this in every post I made, but for the sake of posterity, I embrace any and all unencrypted satellite transmissions (well, maybe not ALL....lol) and appreciate the ability to have the option to partake of the content at my leisure.
Dont feel sorry for me, I'm good. I do not need nor do I seek validation from anyone on any position. (Textbook type A. Comes with the territory) I was not trampling you specifically, just underscoring the content of your post that I predicted would be posted by someone. Would it make you feel better if I held your hands and sang Cum-By-Ya with you? ........did you read this?
I dont think a 23,000 mile long waveguide could get them closer to transmitting an uplink signal...........
WE?..........are you admitting association? Perhaps that explains your cheerleading tendencies. As for FreeDBS, well yeah, that was kinda the point of my post.
Nobody?....End of story? You seem to have a tendency to speak in absolutes on topics that are totally beyond your control......... I am not up in arms about anything, however you seem to be getting very excited over this topic........
EXACTLY.
I seldom find fuzz on my nutz......now if we are talking in the belly button then .....perhaps that is TMI......
Everyone?..... more absolutes?.....What evidence? Feels what way? Truthfully I'm not sure what to make of that statement. It seems out of place.
Good for the community............hmmm.....Enlightenment?
Damn, that's profound! You ever consider giving up your day job and becoming a philosopher?
I really hate that song, but if you REALLY need it...
:
:
:"Cum by Ya My Lord, Cum By Ya........."
k:
:up:clap!sadroll:sleeo:river
Would somebody please hurry up and feel the damned love so we can move on!
Didnt yo say something about not having to prove anything?
I Always Do!
Now are we CLEAR?