Great news, glad you finally got a receiver that worked out.
Thanks, it's has been a long process to get this far.
Now I can focus on the other aspects of the project.
I set up again and tweaked my dish's focal length for the best C/N.
As I would have expected the 10' dish is giving me a 8 dB average C/N. With a quality level of 68-69%.
As for a previous question that was asked many pages ago by KWX. The signal level varies by .3 dB C/N here. I have seen no more then that over the 5 hours I have had the station up and going.
I have several movies I made with the images I got from my system on my sites page.
They can be found here.
Hurricane Aletta Meso sector
Severe storms over the Upper Midwest meso sector
So now with the info from N6BY I will again look into the septum feed. Since Brett had such good results as well as Weather01089 and KWX with theirs I want to approach this again.
My first round one didn't work out, so I will build a square one with a choke ring. The results should be as good as Brett's. I'm figuring at min. 9 dB C/N could be had.
I can also focus on the final version of the Amplifier block that will be out at the dish. I will have more parts to test for here including a couple of ebay bought preamps.
Ok, now I'm going to put out some theories on here, these are my opinion not tested.
One of the questions that has been going through my mind is why is the septum feed working about 2 dB better then the 2 probe feed...?
Here's what I think.
1. The septum feed gives most likely better isolation.
Why? With the 2 probe feed you can lock to either RH or LH polarization's with out changing a thing, also the 2 polarization's are the same amplitude when either one locked.
This is unexpected, I would have thought that the feed lines going to the probes would have to be reversed so to get the other stream. This goes with the 90 degree phase shift in the combiner. Since that both streams can be locked with no changes I figure that the isolation is not as good as it could be.
2.This may have a strong association with the above:
The circular polarization may not be as clean as it could be. Even though the signal comes in with no errors.
The big thing with the septum feed is the purity of the the circular polarization, and that had a definite effect on the signal level and quality.
3. More connections? insertion loss?
Possible, When ever a combiner or splitter is used there is insertion losses. The losses seem very small but add up quickly before the first preamp.
The septum feed may not have as much as an issue with this as it uses the waveguide it self as the splitter and has no other circuits that the signal needs to go through before the first preamp. This totals in a low loss path to the first preamp.
Summery...
If one is to want RGB or both streams then the septum feed is the way to go. The 2 probe cantenna is a good working feed if built properly but is best used on a single stream. The septum feed though more expensive is well worth the extra price for the performance you get with it.
Can the cantenna be made to work better in the future?
Maybe, but the question then boils down to.. what will it cost? and does that cost out weigh the price of the septum feed?
This is far beyond my knowledge base, though there are some on here that may be able to figure that out. In my case the septum feed (I think) can be made at a reasonable price with a bit of elbow grease and soldering.