The carrying capacity of AMC-6 (R-2) is much more than R-1 on an CONUS basis. VOOM has 11 TPs that it owns and 2 TPs on loan on 61.5.
Currently VOOM is running 13 transponders using 8PSK modulation, 22 million symbols a second with 5/6 forward error correction code and 188/204 RL error correction (see www.lyngsat.com). This makes each TP carry 22 *3 *5 /6 *188 / 204 or 50.68 mbit/sec. 50.68 Mbit/sec * 13 TPs is a total of 658.84 Mbit/sec total carrying capacity for VOOM on 61.5.
Echostar is running 105 (low power) at a symbol rate of 26 million, 2/3 FEC and 188/204 RL. One could argue that R-2 could probably do 3/4 FEC since it is 2x the power of 105 (E* runs some TPs at 5/6 on 121). Lets assume 3/4 FEC and 8PSK. So, R-2 would be 26 *3 *3 /4 *188 /204 or 53.91 Mbit/sec/TP. 16 * 53.91 = 862.56. This is a little more than 200 Mbit/sec more capacity on R-2 than R-1. This would increase VOOM's capacity 31%. Remember this is only 16 of the 24 TPs on R-2. It would be possible for them to gain 50% more TPs when they want.
Ok, the math does not make sense right now. R-2 has a lot more capacity than R-1. Assuming about 40k subs to switch to R-2 even at $300/sub to switch would be 12 million. Rental on R-2 appears to be about $10 million per year for the 16TPs (guess based on note 13 in CVC annual reports). In a 15 year scenero VOOM would spend $162 million on rental and conversio costs. This is less than R-1 cost E*. Plus you get to pay the money over time vs up front cost of buying a satellite.
So, why would Dolan Sr be so upset about the sale of R-1 to E* since it would be cheaper and he would get to carry more channels using R-2. Remember also this is BEFORE MPEG-4 being considered. Well there is one thing that R-1 can do that R-2 cannot do... that is spot beams. Perhaps Dolan Sr. wants to start LIL service into the spots on R-1. This is the only reason I can think of why he would want R-1 at this time. This probably happens to be the reason E* wants R-1.
Currently VOOM is running 13 transponders using 8PSK modulation, 22 million symbols a second with 5/6 forward error correction code and 188/204 RL error correction (see www.lyngsat.com). This makes each TP carry 22 *3 *5 /6 *188 / 204 or 50.68 mbit/sec. 50.68 Mbit/sec * 13 TPs is a total of 658.84 Mbit/sec total carrying capacity for VOOM on 61.5.
Echostar is running 105 (low power) at a symbol rate of 26 million, 2/3 FEC and 188/204 RL. One could argue that R-2 could probably do 3/4 FEC since it is 2x the power of 105 (E* runs some TPs at 5/6 on 121). Lets assume 3/4 FEC and 8PSK. So, R-2 would be 26 *3 *3 /4 *188 /204 or 53.91 Mbit/sec/TP. 16 * 53.91 = 862.56. This is a little more than 200 Mbit/sec more capacity on R-2 than R-1. This would increase VOOM's capacity 31%. Remember this is only 16 of the 24 TPs on R-2. It would be possible for them to gain 50% more TPs when they want.
Ok, the math does not make sense right now. R-2 has a lot more capacity than R-1. Assuming about 40k subs to switch to R-2 even at $300/sub to switch would be 12 million. Rental on R-2 appears to be about $10 million per year for the 16TPs (guess based on note 13 in CVC annual reports). In a 15 year scenero VOOM would spend $162 million on rental and conversio costs. This is less than R-1 cost E*. Plus you get to pay the money over time vs up front cost of buying a satellite.
So, why would Dolan Sr be so upset about the sale of R-1 to E* since it would be cheaper and he would get to carry more channels using R-2. Remember also this is BEFORE MPEG-4 being considered. Well there is one thing that R-1 can do that R-2 cannot do... that is spot beams. Perhaps Dolan Sr. wants to start LIL service into the spots on R-1. This is the only reason I can think of why he would want R-1 at this time. This probably happens to be the reason E* wants R-1.