Bias is one thing. Flat out wrong is another. I will always correct misinformation.Most people on this site are. Are you going to criticize those who are biased when they agree with you?
>Contract expiring
>Comcast says channels will go off unless new contract is negotiated
>Dish throws a tantrum, makes vague claims of "breach of contract"
>Channels have to stay on until Dish's claim is investigated, regardless if baseless or not
Why are you bringing MSNBC into this? Also Rachel Maddow > other talking heads.How is this baseless? Their contract reads that they cannot warn that channels will be removed(either party) until within 72 hours of expiration. That would be the 17th. When did the scrolling start? Prior to Thirsday, that's for damn sure. Also, there is no claim to be investigated. Comcast doesn't have the authority to remove channels, if dish opts for arbitration, as prescribed by the state department and the FCC. Sounds like you are going in this biased already. Comcast are the sleaze balls here, without doubt. And just a reminder, those claims that Dish was going to drop them... Also a lie. Comcast would have been the only one that could have removed them if they didn't get the price they wanted, but that wouldn't serve their purpose. Everything they said was about as truthful and correct as what you find on their MSNBC... The fact that we are arguing this is asinine... Here, just for your reading pleasure, I'll leave this:
http://deadline.com/2016/03/dish-ne...ation-settle-dispute-nbcuniversal-1201722943/
Well it is turning political again.............Why are you bringing MSNBC into this? Also Rachel Maddow > other talking heads.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
It was unprovoked political though. Like didn't have to mention MSNBC at all but went for a cheap shot...Well it is turning political again.............
Did you even read the pdf earlier in this thread? Comcast violated the terms of their agreement. What do want Dish to do, just pay whatever ridiculous increase that Comcast is asking for? Let prices continue to escalate?>Contract expiring
>Comcast says channels will go off unless new contract is negotiated
>Dish throws a tantrum, makes vague claims of "breach of contract"
>Channels have to stay on until Dish's claim is investigated, regardless if baseless or not
Did you even read the pdf earlier in this thread? Comcast violated the terms of their agreement. What do want Dish to do, just pay whatever ridiculous increase that Comcast is asking for? Let prices continue to escalate?
I hope we get to keep AutoHop.Probably not, as whatever decision is made for Dish will affect every other provider as their contracts come for renewal. I can almost guarantee one condition in the NBC contract will be a rate match when others come for renewal.
That is the same as taking it away for me.Likely so, just with a 7 day wait.
Um, I wasn't referring to you.Bias is one thing. Flat out wrong is another. I will always correct misinformation.
I agree with you. But there are plenty of bias examples on this board (I'm assuming others also). I rarely see people called out when they are part of the majority.To Sam, yes, I have corrected people that agree with me, and continue on with incorrect statements. Bias blinders do not help any conversation, even if they agree with me. Actually, when people agree with me but refuse to see the other side, it hurts my argument, not helps.
I know you weren't, but I was defending the other person's actions by saying I would do the same thing and gave my reasons.Um, I wasn't referring to you.
Also, if the majority is wrong using baseless information or bias, then I will call it out too.I agree with you. But there are plenty of bias examples on this board (I'm assuming others also). I rarely see people called out when they are part of the majority.
Lol. Watch my posts Sam. I will. Then again I am here so rarely lately. Bias is bad no matter the side it is on. And to be frank, the majority has been wrong on a consistent basis(not to be political but since an election year, look what's happening now).
I'll be sure to look for you both to post at the next threat of blackout when folks call the station owners "greedy" then. That is baseless (We have no idea what is being asked, what the arrangements were in the past, what other providers are paying, what Dish is asking for, whether each side is negotiating in good faith, etc.) and biased (Dish must be in the right, the station owners must be wrong).Also, if the majority is wrong using baseless information or bias, then I will call it out too.