I wouldn't call being a fan of a particular sport "peculiar."You seem to have summarily dismissed Sling as a viable option in a thread weighing options and your dismissal was based on a rather peculiar condition.
I wouldn't call being a fan of a particular sport "peculiar."You seem to have summarily dismissed Sling as a viable option in a thread weighing options and your dismissal was based on a rather peculiar condition.
I didn't suggest that the fans were peculiar. Promoting soccer/cricket/footie coverage as an make or break condition for choosing a programming provider is extraordinary.I wouldn't call being a fan of a particular sport "peculiar."
I didn't suggest that the fans were peculiar. Promoting soccer/cricket/footie coverage as an make or break condition for choosing a programming provider is extraordinary.
You seem to have summarily dismissed Sling as a viable option in a thread weighing options and your dismissal was based on a rather peculiar condition.
The criteria might make sense for a Brit (or anyone else who has become a soccer fan for any reason) but that's not the question. The question is whether or not EPL (or similar) is a widely held criteria for most who subscribe to US pay TV.Maybe the poster is a Brit? In which case his choice makes perfect sense.
What widely held criteria did you use to make that judgement?Sling tv is not a real video provider
Dish Network is the provider.What widely held criteria did you use to make that judgement?
Their's is a full as many mom and pop operations and it is much more widely available.I don't care if Sling Tv is owned by Dish or not, it's not a real video provider for the fact they do not have a full channel lineup.
I'm a Yank. But I can't do without my Tottenham Hospur.Maybe the poster is a Brit? In which case his choice makes perfect sense.