It's still debating if Dish will use spot-beams.
Debated by whom? I thought that was long since settled.???
It's still debating if Dish will use spot-beams.
Let's say Ciel 2 goes live on Feb. 1, will Charlie add NEW content at that time?
"...Dish Network is not leasing a satellite they can move..." I agree totally with that, although I have not separately (independently) read of Canada's right to reserve use of one transponder. As the granting authority, Canada may actually have a right to several, if a need is shown. I think if Dish ultimately wanted to move Ciel-2 to 77W (and have 129W occupied by a newer Ciel-2 Partners satellite) that could be made to happen by agreement between Dish, Ciel-2 Partners, and the holders of the 77W slot. If that happened within the next 2 or 3 years, E-8 then could presumably be moved on over to 72.7 or 61.5.
Name for us just one satellite that has the capability to stow solar panels, and then redeploy them again! (I don't think such a beast was ever built.)I would doubt - solar panels are fragile and couldn't survive in case of high trust.
Name for us just one satellite that has the capability to stow solar panels, and then redeploy them again! (I don't think such a beast was ever built.)
The way I understood how satellites move is to reduce the orbit slightly and wait for it to come around to the location you want, then increase the orbit to park it. No high thrust is involved here at all. Satellites are shuffled all the time (esp. the Echostar ones) with panels deployed.
...............
Doing some elementary math of my own, I figured out that if Ciel-2 continues at its current pace it will reach 129 on Christmas day, some 91 hours from now. It would be irritating if Ciel-2 takes the same amount of time to go active as E11 did, because that would be on...you guessed it, Feb. 1.
Regards,
Fitzie
Fitzie;
The last TLE update was on Dec 15 with no update since then. It's probably sitting at 138W with tests in progress.
77 is a Mexican slot.
The holders of the slot are already building a satellite to launch to 77, with spot beams. Some of the capacity will be leased by Dish.
Ciel-2, being a Canadian satellite owned by a Canadian company, in a Canadian slot (129w), is not likely to be moved to a Mexican slot (77w) by a customer that is leasing it's transponders.
We went too far off-topic with the side track of filing 77W location.
Should we spin off new thread for the subject ?
We are very used to Dish moving satellites to new slots after being replaced by new more powerful satellites.
What we need to remember is that the newer satellites are spot beam satellites that are designed for that location.
Probably the biggest reason that EchoStar 8 is not using any of its spot beam at 77 West, is that those spot beams were designed for 110 West, and now only land on random areas.
Ciel-2 is designed with 145 spot beams that hit locations across the USA and Canada. It would make no sense to move it to 77 West, where - like E*8 - most of those spot beams would not land in usable areas.
Instead, it makes more sense to do as they are doing now, build the new satellite for 77 West, with spot beams designed for that location.
Is this true? I always assumed that they could move the spot beams around. The assumption was not really based on any information or knowledge but I guess I always considered it a necessity to be able to move the spotbeams.