Carrier IQ references discovered in Apple's iOS
iOS 5 has an opt out clause, that is suppose to prevent it from functioning.
iOS 5 has an opt out clause, that is suppose to prevent it from functioning.
Carrier IQ references discovered in Apple's iOS
iOS 5 has an opt out clause, that is suppose to prevent it from functioning.
More evidence.It looks more like the carriers have the last say.
More evidence.
This CIQ-gate has a chance to shed some light on the carrier-manufacturer relationship.
When a carrier postpones (sometimes indefinitely) an OS update for an Android phone,
it sounds like incorporating CIQ in the standard ROM is one of the reasons for the delay (on top of "skinning").
Whenever you can bypass the carrier while doing the update (e.g. rooted phones) you'll more likely not get it.
If you get the update directly from the manufacturer (e.g. RIM) with all the security in place,
they might not have the CIQ install themselves but should know about the carrier doing it...
Diogen.
Last login: Fri Nov 25 14:06:15 on console
XX-MacBook-Pro:~ XXXXX$ ping hupload-vzw99.carrieriq.com
PING hupload-vzw99.carrieriq.com (204.235.122.251): 56 data bytes
Well, I refuse to accept that. AND if that is Google's position, then maybe it is evil.
I am thrilled that this tracking system is being publicly exposed in the media. And I suspect the millions of Android and Blackberry users out there do not want their information shared the way it is being done.
Saw this in a comment, and tried it myself.
IF Verizon is NOT using CIQ, then what is this?
That was discussed in the prior page. It is off by default; only used for diagnostics, and there is a setting in iOS about it. Not true with Android or BB.
"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer."what about the patriot act which essentially suspended one of the amendments...
all your cut/paste demonstrates is that you can resolve a hostname and have a path to the server.
Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk
The point is the path exists. Why would it if Verizon isn't using it? Seems contradictory to say they are no using it.
And the Patrio Act may have carved warrant exceptions, but it did not suspend the 4th, 5th, or 6th Amendments.
You can be lax about your rights if you want, but my point is it is important to be vigilant about crap like this.
Then you don't understand how TCP/IP works. I am not saying that to be rude, impolite or condescending. There's a fundamental lack of understanding on your part.
unless explicitly blocked by a firewall, or the port is not listening at the far end it's supposed to respond.
at this point all you have demonstrated is that this works the same as www . satelliteguys . us .
i have serious issues with lack of due process on US soil. I would like to think that that is hyper vigilant about my rights and the rights of others.
see previous.
Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk
Just like with the GPS controversy:...the setting only exists in iOS 5. Older versions don't have that setting.
Seems to be confirmedIt looks more like the carriers have the last say.
Carrier IQ is required on devices by a number of U.S carriers so if consumers or media have any questions
about the practices relating to, or data collected by, Carrier IQ we'd advise them to contact their carrier.
Seems to be confirmed
HTC says it doesn't receive data from Carrier IQ, investigating ways to turn it off | The Verge
Now the question is: is this the carriers or Department of Homeland Security? I'd suspect the latter.
If only because if it wasn't DHS, then CIQ would by now have competition...
Doesn't devoting one day of the coming xmas break to learn Android hacking sound tempting?
Diogen.