Carrier IQ Android OEM tracking software... logs your every move... and not happy about XDA

It looks more like the carriers have the last say.
More evidence.

This CIQ-gate has a chance to shed some light on the carrier-manufacturer relationship.

When a carrier postpones (sometimes indefinitely) an OS update for an Android phone,
it sounds like incorporating CIQ in the standard ROM is one of the reasons for the delay (on top of "skinning").
Whenever you can bypass the carrier while doing the update (e.g. rooted phones) you'll more likely not get it.

If you get the update directly from the manufacturer (e.g. RIM) with all the security in place,
they might not have the CIQ install themselves but should know about the carrier doing it...

Diogen.
 
More evidence.

This CIQ-gate has a chance to shed some light on the carrier-manufacturer relationship.

When a carrier postpones (sometimes indefinitely) an OS update for an Android phone,
it sounds like incorporating CIQ in the standard ROM is one of the reasons for the delay (on top of "skinning").
Whenever you can bypass the carrier while doing the update (e.g. rooted phones) you'll more likely not get it.

If you get the update directly from the manufacturer (e.g. RIM) with all the security in place,
they might not have the CIQ install themselves but should know about the carrier doing it...

Diogen.

And from the link in that story to Verizon' denial that it is on their phones, it looks like they are doing a little song and dance.

Verizon denies Carrier IQ is on any of its phones | The Verge

If they claim they aren't using it, then who is?? And why is it there in the first place?
 
Saw this in a comment, and tried it myself.

IF Verizon is NOT using CIQ, then what is this?

Last login: Fri Nov 25 14:06:15 on console
XX-MacBook-Pro:~ XXXXX$ ping hupload-vzw99.carrieriq.com
PING hupload-vzw99.carrieriq.com (204.235.122.251): 56 data bytes
 
Well, I refuse to accept that. AND if that is Google's position, then maybe it is evil.

you can refuse to accept it, but unless you are traveling across an encrypted channel end to end for every packet the data is readable. the practical matter is storing it long enough for analysis.

I'm not saying i disagree with your expectation, but whether that agrees with reality is another matter entirely.

I am thrilled that this tracking system is being publicly exposed in the media. And I suspect the millions of Android and Blackberry users out there do not want their information shared the way it is being done.

i chopped a lot out, all of which i agree with, but I'm not too sure that matters much.

what about the patriot act which essentially suspended one of the amendments to the constitution (5th i believe).

the digital era has given the ability to provide almost complete access to the minutiae of our lives. it is the big fight of this century.



Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk
 
Google most likely has nothing to do with this (unless it is part of Google Apps; the rest is opensourced).

With others - Nokia, RIM, Microsoft, Apple - whoever provides the binary either
installs CIQ or enables the hooks to have it installed by the carriers, i.e. knows about it...

Diogen.
 
all your cut/paste demonstrates is that you can resolve a hostname and have a path to the server.

Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk


The point is the path exists. Why would it if Verizon isn't using it? Seems contradictory to say they are no using it.


And the Patrio Act may have carved warrant exceptions, but it did not suspend the 4th, 5th, or 6th Amendments.

You can be lax about your rights if you want, but my point is it is important to be vigilant about crap like this.
 
The point is the path exists. Why would it if Verizon isn't using it? Seems contradictory to say they are no using it.

Then you don't understand how TCP/IP works. I am not saying that to be rude, impolite or condescending. There's a fundamental lack of understanding on your part.

unless explicitly blocked by a firewall, or the port is not listening at the far end it's supposed to respond.

at this point all you have demonstrated is that this works the same as www . satelliteguys . us .



And the Patrio Act may have carved warrant exceptions, but it did not suspend the 4th, 5th, or 6th Amendments.

i have serious issues with lack of due process on US soil. I would like to think that that is hyper vigilant about my rights and the rights of others.


You can be lax about your rights if you want, but my point is it is important to be vigilant about crap like this.

see previous.

Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk
 
Then you don't understand how TCP/IP works. I am not saying that to be rude, impolite or condescending. There's a fundamental lack of understanding on your part.

unless explicitly blocked by a firewall, or the port is not listening at the far end it's supposed to respond.

at this point all you have demonstrated is that this works the same as www . satelliteguys . us .





i have serious issues with lack of due process on US soil. I would like to think that that is hyper vigilant about my rights and the rights of others.




see previous.

Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk

Yeah, I don't understand TCP/IP :rolleyes:

Come on John. I am NOT at all clear why you are so combative about this. My POINT was simply that the path exists. YES, I understand I can ping it; I can't show what is being SENT TO IT. But my point is that they have that subdomain setup for a reason. Oy.
 
It looks more like the carriers have the last say.
Seems to be confirmed
HTC says it doesn't receive data from Carrier IQ, investigating ways to turn it off | The Verge
Carrier IQ is required on devices by a number of U.S carriers so if consumers or media have any questions
about the practices relating to, or data collected by, Carrier IQ we'd advise them to contact their carrier.

Now the question is: is this the carriers or Department of Homeland Security? I'd suspect the latter.
If only because if it wasn't DHS, then CIQ would by now have competition...

Doesn't devoting one day of the coming xmas break to learn Android hacking sound tempting? :)

Diogen.
 
Seems to be confirmed
HTC says it doesn't receive data from Carrier IQ, investigating ways to turn it off | The Verge


Now the question is: is this the carriers or Department of Homeland Security? I'd suspect the latter.
If only because if it wasn't DHS, then CIQ would by now have competition...

Doesn't devoting one day of the coming xmas break to learn Android hacking sound tempting? :)

Diogen.

Diogen, I disagree about DHS. I am doubtful. While I would not put it past them, that would be a HUGE issue - and a major scandal in the waiting. I think the Carriers are the guilty ones. They insist on putting it on devices. Why?
 

iTunes 10.5.2 vs 10.5.1

AT&T drops $39 billion bid to buy T-Mobile USA

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)