On that note though, wasn't Roger Maris' 61 home runs a remarkable achievement for a man who never had anything close to that number before or after? He had 39 the year before and 31 the year after. Was he on steroids as well in 1961? Barry Bonds had 49 homers the year before the 73 and 46 the year after. Beyond the obvious, how is that different from Maris? Percentage wise, I'd say it's very close. Further, Hank Aaron admitted in his autobiography that he took amphetamines in 1968. Does that admission render his stats suspect as well?
i have no evidence that eh is on steroids mow and given the testing, the BALCO case, and the Mitchell inestigation he would be crazy to be on them now.
yes his 1993 stats were impressive---along with his 2007 ones. But what leads people to think he was "juiced" at some point is the the BALCO investigation and the incredible increase in his home run output around the turn of the century. Citing his production proves he is a good athlete but does not prove or disprove whether he was using steroids during the years in question. interestingly his 73 hom e run was not during the period of the formal ban but several other years were and his 73 home run year was one of the factors that put pressure on baseball to enact a ban.