How desperate is the government for Barry Bonds??!!

Just when you think this thread couldn't sink any lower, a new angle develops. Now we're discussing the validity of Barry Bonds* urine sample? :what

What's next, Bonds* and the likelihood of testicular atrophy??

No...IF YOU HAD READ the posted article, the JUDGE is thinking of throwing out the evidence because....TA DAHHHH.....it might not be HIS urine sample....:eureka
 
No...IF YOU HAD READ the posted article, the JUDGE is thinking of throwing out the evidence because....TA DAHHHH.....it might not be HIS urine sample....:eureka

It's not that simple. The man who collected his blood and piss was also his personal trainer who is refusing to testify. The reason the evidence is probably going to be ruled inadmissible is NOT because "it might not be his urine"...it is because without a sponsoring witness (the trainer), the evidence is inadmissible hearsay.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Top