I adjusted my 1000.2 after using the d500 for 129, it allowed me to get higher SS opn 110 and 119.
This might be because we are on different sides of the country?
I live in the Puget Sound area of Washington State where 129 is more of a problem than with most everywhere else. When I decided to upgrade to prepare when FSNW will (eventually *%/&#) go HD, I went out and got a 1000.2 with a a 211 and a 311. When getting pointers for the 1000.2 (I have installed a couple of 500s for friends) is when I found out about the problems with 129 here in the NW. I put it up and, as always, took care in setting the mast and pointing the dish. Readings for 129 were from 40 - mid 60.
I bought a Winegard DS-4061 to use the "LNB IN" for 129 (and cover 129 LNB with foil), but I wanted to do some experimenting. I got a DPP LNB for my 500 dish assembly and wanted to compare the 110/119 signals on both. The surface area is larger on the 1000.2, but the parabola is shaped to direct 3 signals instead of 2 (analogy of a 1 satellite dish vs a 2 satellite dish).
I took extra care to really fine tune the 1000.2, and these are the readings I got (from the 211 receiver):
110 119
Tr 11 = 84 Tr 11 = 100
Tr 15 = 83 Tr 15 = 98
Tr 16 = 87 Tr 16 = 99
Tr 17 = 80 Tr 17 = 97
I then installed the 500 with the DPP LNB and this is what I got:
110 119
Tr 11 = 90 Tr 11 = 99
Tr 15 = 90 Tr 15 = 98
Tr 16 = 97 Tr 16 = 98
Tr 17 = 89 Tr 17 = 96
The readings on 119 stayed about the same but I got an increase on 110 of 6 - 9 points using the 500.
I packed the 1000.2 in it's box and put it away for future use.
And the 24" dish for 129 performed well too:
Tr 01 = 77
Tr 02 = 78
Tr 04 = 90
Tr 05 = 82
Tr 06 = 64
Tr 07 = 77
Tr 08 = 85
Tr 09 = 88
Tr 10 = 87
Tr 11 = 77
Tr 12 = 87
Tr 13 = 88
Tr 16 = 79
Tr 17 = 80
Tr 18 = 78
Tr 21 = 78
Tr 22 = 78
Tr 23 = 79
Tr 27 = 80
Tr 30 = 89
Tr 31 = 95
Tr 32 = 81
For this area, I am quite happy with those 129 readings.