WSJ: New board takes no action on VOOM

[compson]

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=CVC
Unfortunately, you have to pay to read the article.

 

[riffjim4069]

Not a biggie since this Forum is probably the source of their informaiton.

 

[Scott Greczkowski]

Yup you are probably correct about that.

I know Peter Grant from the WSJ might be mad at me, last time I talked to him I would not give him my sources for information, he kept prying and prying for them. But what Mr Grant does not understand if I gave up my sources they would no longer be my sources. Also he should understand that if they wanted to talk to him they would have contacted him themselves.

 

[gutter]

But what Mr Grant does not understand if I gave up my sources they would no longer be my sources. Also he should understand that if they wanted to talk to him they would have contacted him themselves.

mmmmmmmm. that is what reporters themselves say when asked by a judge to give up their source. Maybe Scott will be hauled off to jail! Who wants to join me in putting up his bail? I'll give $5.

 

[compson]

So what do your sources say?

 

[mike123abc]

I read the article and there was nothing new in it... Just are reported the board met for 2 1/2 hours but no announce decisions.

 

[James Long]

I read the article and there was nothing new in it... Just are reported the board met for 2 1/2 hours but no announce decisions.

Did it say that they decided to adjorn?

JL