It has been well established that the Bengals were the worst team of the 1990s and that their 14-straight non-winning seasons from 1991-2004 was one of the worst runs in NFL history.
IMO, there was a team far worse than those Bungles- the Tanpa Bay Buccaneers from 1983-1996 (14 straight losing seasons as well).
I know ramy and brainfry will disagree, but here's my case for the Buccaneers as being worse than the Bengals ever were, even in their 1990s nadir:
1. Cincinnati, from 1991-2004, had three 8-8 seasons and went 7-9 once during that stretch. Tampa had 10 or more losses EVERY YEAR from 1983-1994. Cincinnati got up to 5-straight 10-loss seasons.
2. The Bengals had decent players; Boomer, Munoz, Carl Pickens, Ocho Cinco- while Tampa had the inconsistent Vinny Interceptaverde and little else.
3. Better team colors and logo.
What would YOU rather look like? Scayr tiger stripes or a hairdresseer/Creamsicle?
IMO, there was a team far worse than those Bungles- the Tanpa Bay Buccaneers from 1983-1996 (14 straight losing seasons as well).
I know ramy and brainfry will disagree, but here's my case for the Buccaneers as being worse than the Bengals ever were, even in their 1990s nadir:
1. Cincinnati, from 1991-2004, had three 8-8 seasons and went 7-9 once during that stretch. Tampa had 10 or more losses EVERY YEAR from 1983-1994. Cincinnati got up to 5-straight 10-loss seasons.
2. The Bengals had decent players; Boomer, Munoz, Carl Pickens, Ocho Cinco- while Tampa had the inconsistent Vinny Interceptaverde and little else.
3. Better team colors and logo.
What would YOU rather look like? Scayr tiger stripes or a hairdresseer/Creamsicle?