It appears that it doesn’t need the Watch at all since the Watch is just a remote to the phone.
Sans the rose colored glasses, you would have read that I was speaking of the 18 hour "reserve", not the full-on daily battery life. Using this number, I eliminate all of the other possible uses of the watch and narrow the discussion of what it takes to keep the watch keeping time (but not with the display active).Their 18 hour life on a charge number is way conservative life span and I suspect is based on the convenience of putting on charge every night while you sleep so it is fully charged for the whole waking day.
Since the consumption of the watch in life support mode is ~10mA/hour (or much more if you look at it your way), it would take a 1,700-2,000% improvement in solar cell efficiency just to keep time. Your conclusion is surely way off base.conclusion- I think your conclusion is wrong on whether a solar cell recharging would be effective or not. I don't think present technology solar cell power per sq inch will be able to run the watch indefinitely but if we get a ~300% improvement, that would be worthy of bragging, regardless who invents the solar powered smart watch.
Moore's law doesn't speak to either batteries or power consumption. It speaks uniquely to computing power (and its prescription hasn't been met recently). As such, citing Moore's law is a red herring.Moore's law- you double the capacity every two years.
I'm guessing you've never experienced hearing aids or other battery-operated devices with tiny batteries that always die at the worst possible time. See more at dead watch batteries in lavaliers.Another option is a watch with swappable batteries.
GPS alone (even with WaaS) is notoriously poor for altitude. GPS systems that compare against a topographic map are very accurate but require considerably more computation.My altitude is showing 40 ft. I thought I was 45 ft above mean sea level.
How does the device decide whether you've fallen or just dropped the device if it isn't securely attached to your body?I'm thinking one that works with the iPhone, not requiring a watch.
GPS alone (even with WaaS) is notoriously poor for altitude. GPS systems that compare against a topographic map are very accurate but require considerably more computation.
By definition, the altitude reported is supposed to be around 1.5 times less accurate than horizontal positioning 95% of the time.
Without WAAS, GPS is good within 15 meters altitude and DGPS is good to 10 meters. A lot of the range has to do with eccentricities in the orbit of the satellites.
Garmin says that elevation error can be as high as +/-400'.
A reasonable assumption. Using a barometer depends on knowing what the corrected sea-level barometric pressure (Kollsman setting) is and now there's a way to "look it up" and find where to look it up for.The new watch has a barometer (which is what I believe Don was using as the elevation reference).
The new watch has a barometer (which is what I believe Don was using as the elevation reference).
Actually, the watch elevation is GPS based and even shows your GPS ( Lat/Lon) coordinates on the screen to 4 decimal places. It also gives a +- error of the altitude.
The series 2 had the same barometer built in (according to IFixIt) as the 3, however for whatever reason they never activated it in the 2.The new watch has a barometer (which is what I believe Don was using as the elevation reference).
Are you getting the GPS info from an app on the watch? I don't see anyplace to get that information from what comes with the watch.
So it is more a measure of "thin air" than anything else?The Barometer is a "relative change pressure" that is used for exercise data computation.
2. FallSafety Pro for Apple Watch currently acts as a remote control for the iPhone app. As a result, the iPhone must be carried on a person's body. This includes Apple Watch Series 3.
So it only works in places that one would often be wearing a mechanical fall-protection device?1. FallSafety Pro is designed for professionals who work at height (on ladders, roofs, scaffolding, etc.). For this reason, it detects larger falls and impacts while filtering out smaller events to help prevent false alarms on the jobsite.
This illustrates why I haven't turned on Cellular for my S3 Apple Watch yet. Have any apps been updated to run on the watch independent of the app on the iPhone? None of the updates I have installed so far state they will do this.
According to an article on digitaltrends.com, the S2 was 32% greater capacity than the S1 and the S3 is <4% greater capacity than the S2. These comparisons are with respect to the 38mm Apple Watches.I also read that the battery on the Watch 3 is 32% larger than on the original Watch.