Well I didnt buy DVD until it was 200 bucks and it was 100 times more popular than BD.
That's great to hear.
Now answer my original question--How low do YOU think they'll have to go?
Well I didnt buy DVD until it was 200 bucks and it was 100 times more popular than BD.
to do what? And anything BD does do depends on adoption of HDTV's and not SDTV which will be around for many many years.That's great to hear.
Now answer my original question--How low do YOU think they'll have to go?
Higher demand, higher prices.[/QUOTE
Higher demand=more production. Then lower prices.
What economics school did you go to?
Actually classical economic theory would tell you that the increased demand would raise prices, that the higher prices would lure new suppliers into the market and that eventually a new equilibrium would occur----but that it would likely be at a HIGHER price than what came before. I know of no economic theory that holds that an increase in demand CAUSES a reduction in price.
in the case of tech products there is a lot more going on than that.
The question was will prices NOW come down. Supply has not changed but demand has shifted out causing an increase in the price effect. Sure an increase in demand COULD lead to an increase in production but I was baseing my answer in the near term.[/QUOTE]Higher demand=more production. Then lower prices.
What economics school did you go to?
I would pay attention to those that were around to buy the first DVD players not the ones sucking on their thumbs at the time.It seems we have alot of HD-DVD guys and Sony haters who believe that they know more of what is going to happen to the BD/DVD market then they knew what was going to happen to the HD-DVD market. Hummm- now how are we to believe -- the individuals that back HD-DVD or those who backed BD -- HUMMMM?
That must be at least in part directed at me as well... It's much simpler, Joe.HD-DVD backers really believed that the format was the only one posistioned to replace DVD are in shock...
to do what? And anything BD does do depends on adoption of HDTV's and not SDTV which will be around for many many years.
Great post:up:up:upThe early adoption of higher priced DVD players does not really equate to High Def players. First of all, even on normal TV's, a DVD looked a lot better than VHS tapes. To really appreciate the difference between a DVD and a Blu Ray disk, you really need an HD wide screen TV, which not everybody has yet, so the market may be smaller. Also, even with a good HD TV, the difference between an HD disk and a normal DVD that is upconverted on a decent player (like my HD-A30) is not nearly as great. So the perceived value of buying and HD player is not as great for most people. And this goes for the media as well. The price difference between a DVD and a Blu Ray for a new release is way too big for the average consumer. Finally, when DVD came out, it did not have to compete with over the air HD, Cable HD, or Satellite HD. I have lots of HD programming to keep me satisfied, and a potentially growing HD DVD library if fire sales are good on media, so I am not missing a lot by not jumping on the high price (and feature lacking) Blu players. The value is not there for me, and I am sure it is not there for a lot of average consumers. Add to that the fact that people have gotten used to the sales with the competition, if the prices do not come down considerably, prices need to come down for mass sales. But without competition, the Blu Ray companies may not feel they have the need to lower prices. Sony probably hopes that stays like that so they can sell PS3's instead. Until profile 2.0 players hit the $200 price point, I do not see Blu Ray seriously competing against DVD's, and by the time that happens, it may be too late with downloads taking off.
Finally, when DVD came out, it did not have to compete with over the air HD, Cable HD, or Satellite HD.
Isnt that the whole point? In order for BD trolls to tout their progress it will have to come at the expense of DVD now.I wonder if there is going to now be a war between the DVD forum and BD? I hope so. That would be good for the consumer.
When DVD came out it was compatible with every TV in existence. Its market was EVERY home in the country. Different story with BluRay. And because of that BD will grow much slower. Also DVD didnt have to compete with players that upconverted VHS tapes.In other words, same diff as today.
Vurbano,You arent' going to answer me are you?
In an earlier post (#57) you opined that around $300 bucks wouldn't be low enough for "mass adoption".
Just how low would any player have to be before "mass adoption" occurred?
Unless HDTV is mass adopted then there is no mass adoption of BD ever, no matter how low the price goes. Predicting the price now is absurd, but obviously it will be well under 200 bucks.You arent' going to answer me are you?
In an earlier post (#57) you opined that around $300 bucks wouldn't be low enough for "mass adoption".
Just how low would any player have to be before "mass adoption" occurred?