King Kong LIVES 2.0 stars. I gave it a two because I did not like the plot and one must question a whole lot about the movie. For one you can see a younger Linda Hamilton. Yes, the same one as the Terminator. She does not seem to age. The movie stars where the King Kong movie ends. King Kong being shot from the World Trade Center. Who would have thought, at that time, about the World Trace Center was going to be gone years later? It also has the famous shot of Jessica Lange (I think it was her) on Kong's hand. The movie continues to tell the story of how Kong gets a family and him and his family exhibits all the human emotions that you could find in courting a girl, protecting the family, and being a father. This is what is really disturbing about the movie. The movie really does not have a beginning and the end was just kind of ridicuous anyway. Hamilton and her companion were just awful and seem to be running after Kong without a motive or a purpose. What can you do to control such a big gorilla anyway? The movie is awful. The trasnsfer is another that has me all confused. According to IMDB this is supposed to a movie with a OAR of 2:35:1. However, it was shown 1:85:1 with openning and closing credits and I did not see that the aspect ratio got messed up at all. Could this be an open matte transfer? There is a possibility but I do not know at this point. The HD transfer itself was ok. It has its very good moments but when it came to the dark scenes it was somewhat ok.