You posted that in post # 34
Curious, does all the other providers that you could go to carry MSNBC in HD.
As for the channel, I don't dislike it, I have no opinion of it.
I think the whole thing is a NBC thing, not a D thing.
D* could have if they wanted to , placed it on the 101 if they wanted too I suppose, but they would have to pay NBC for the rights to do it.
fwiw, I'm NOT leaving any company over the lack of ONE channel.
First I don't expect people to look up older posts, but I respect that you did. Second, you have every right not to leave over one channel. That doesn't mean that everyone thinks like you do. Sure they would have had to pay NBC and if they had, they would have rightfully be able to advertise their HD Olympic coverage:
"Experience the Olympics like never before.
Watch NBC Universal's coverage of the Vancouver Games on DIRECTV in breathtaking High-Def †. See up to four channels — NBC, CNBC, USA and MSNBC — at the same time on DIRECTV's Sports Mix Channel. Enjoy interactive features, including NBC's Team USA updates, and enhance your Olympic experience with
daily highlights and full-length event replays on
DIRECTV on DEMAND."
BTW, every time I tune to Sports Mix during the Olympics, I've yet to see any Olympics. Maybe that is because I'm in the time-delayed West coast.
Anyway, thanks for your reasoned response.
It is the disconnect between the D* hype and the D* reality I most object to.