It looks as if there are some misconseptions about sueing and being awarded judgements for lawsuits. My best friend, that I grew up with, a lawyer, I've told all about SA and what is happening says this: If SA goes bellyup, Out Of Business, gone.....whatever you want to call it, you can sue but the chance of recovering anything is moot. If there is no OOB, just same company with different product but same owners, there can be judgements. My way of looking at this is I've loved SA ever since 1997 when I paid my $195 for my Lifetime SA, and if through bad business decisions or whatever they went OOB then so-be-it, I wouldn't even think of joining a suit. A company that changes direction with it's product has no problem with a month-to-month lease or purchase. Here they just say, we aren't offering this product anymore, but the Lifetimers purchase is different, we have already bought/purchased the product and the company isn't going out of business. They are changing their service.....hence, changing their product, something that might be good business sense, but not good ethical/moral sense. If I joined a lawsuit(and it would hurt my heart to join), I wouldn't want monetary judgement because that's not what it's all about. I would to send a message that future companies wouldn't/couldn't/shouldn't get away with claiming to be Christian run and operated and doing basically a bait-and-switch. I really don't think that back before Bob Johnson died, none of what is happening would have flied past him.....he'd squashed it like a bug, just the new owners aren't continueing his vision in the manner that he envisioned.