I do plan to go to SA IPTV. Since they are making the receiver free for an 18-mo. commitment, I see it as worth $14.99/mo. to get the service. I am also a "techie" and just intrigued by new technologies. I hope they will choose me for the beta testing, it would fascinate me! If for some reason SA doesn't make it to 18 months, I'm still willing to take the risk and enjoy the service month-by-month for as long as it is there.
I know I can get many/most of the TV/radio channels on-line (in fact, I've already added most to my Internet "Favorites"), so I don't view my $14.99/mo. as paying to receive the channels, but as paying for:
- Convenience of accessing all channels in one spot with a remote, programming guide, ability to watch programs from the last 48 hours without taping.
- Added programming - Sky Angel 2 especially - they broadcast conferences, concerts, etc. I would not receive otherwise. Additionally, Sacred Favorites will not be available on-line, possibly other programming as well.
- Greater likelihood that I will choose to fill my days with God's Word. I could do it free on-line, but would I? Definitely not as much if I have to log onto the site, click several times to get the video/audio started, etc.
For me, those reasons alone make SA IPTV well worth $14.99/mo.
When you consider that DirecTV and Dish have had struggles along the way, it seems more than likely that the DBS business is out of reach long-term for a small player. I am fully persuaded that if Bob Johnson, Sr. was alive in 2007, he would come to the same conclusion. How could his vision include technologies that were not even a glimmer in anyone's mind years ago? His vision wasn't for a method, it was for an outcome.
I know people who thought Sky Angel would be great, but felt too overwhelmed by the idea that they had to get a dish, buy a receiver, maybe get professional installation help. Many also didn't understand that they could have SA and still have other cable or satellite service. I've had cable all along. Now I can tell friends who do have high-speed that they can have SA without the "hassle."
I do feel bad for those who for whatever reason cannot get high-speed Internet. It's an unfortunate consequence of a decision that I have concluded was unavoidable for SA. Their choice wasn't about taking the service away from rural customers -- it was about finding a way to continue offering SA to anyone at all. I'm confident the Lord will provide alternative means of accessing Christian programming for anyone who wants to "eat" His Word daily. That will be part of Glorystar's particular niche -- thank God for them.
And, of course, it's true that Christians, not non-Christians, will make up SA's market base. However, as I take in a steady diet of God's Word and grow to be more Christ-like, I am then better equipped to reach the non-believers in my particular universe. Even in enjoying Christian programming, it is still not just about me!