Here's an honest question...
What really separates a QB like Mark Sanchez from an undrafted QB like Graham Harrell? Is it God given ability, is it a skill set learned in college and how does this translate to success on the NFL level?
Looking at two of the most successful QB's from last year, I'd like to compare Mark Sanchez from USC to Graham Harrell of Texas Tech.
Mark was drafted #5 overall and Graham was not drafted at all. Looking at their collegiate career, you wouldn't have thought there would be such a disparity in their projected abilities at the next level.
Both are 6'3" tall and 200+ lbs. Both have the body to take a blow at the NFL level.
Both Mark and Graham had an amazingly similar QB passer rating of 160.00+. Both also had a completion percentage of at least 65%.
Graham is a year older (23) and has had over 3 years worth of starting experience. Mark is a year younger (22) and has had only 1 year worth of starting experience.
Where do the talent levels of these two become so vastly different? Is it because USC had a more traditional offense that resembled schemes in the NFL? Is it because the Big 12 is like playing against the computer on easy mode?
If both of these QB's have basically the same body type, arm strength and ability to throw the ball with precise acuracy, is it just a difference of one being more educated on X's and O's? If that's the case, why can't Graham Harrell sit on an NFL bench for a few years and be taught the pro-system just as all the other "pro-ready" college QB's have done during their collegiate career? Why are these "system" type QB's written off as a lost cause and not even being drafted?
I want answers people. Help me figure this out....
What really separates a QB like Mark Sanchez from an undrafted QB like Graham Harrell? Is it God given ability, is it a skill set learned in college and how does this translate to success on the NFL level?
Looking at two of the most successful QB's from last year, I'd like to compare Mark Sanchez from USC to Graham Harrell of Texas Tech.
Mark was drafted #5 overall and Graham was not drafted at all. Looking at their collegiate career, you wouldn't have thought there would be such a disparity in their projected abilities at the next level.
Both are 6'3" tall and 200+ lbs. Both have the body to take a blow at the NFL level.
Both Mark and Graham had an amazingly similar QB passer rating of 160.00+. Both also had a completion percentage of at least 65%.
Graham is a year older (23) and has had over 3 years worth of starting experience. Mark is a year younger (22) and has had only 1 year worth of starting experience.
Where do the talent levels of these two become so vastly different? Is it because USC had a more traditional offense that resembled schemes in the NFL? Is it because the Big 12 is like playing against the computer on easy mode?
If both of these QB's have basically the same body type, arm strength and ability to throw the ball with precise acuracy, is it just a difference of one being more educated on X's and O's? If that's the case, why can't Graham Harrell sit on an NFL bench for a few years and be taught the pro-system just as all the other "pro-ready" college QB's have done during their collegiate career? Why are these "system" type QB's written off as a lost cause and not even being drafted?
I want answers people. Help me figure this out....