mperdue said:As I said, there were ways to do the recount that could have changed the outcome but no one petitioned the court to consider those ways. The court has to answer to the counts brought before it. Gore didn't want the entire state recounted because the conventional wisdom at the time said he wouldn't pick up votes that way. Bush didn't want any recount that allowed them to redefine what was considered a valid vote and even though I don't like him, I see his point. That is the issue that the Supreme court decided on; you can't change the way votes are tallied after the fact.
If either candidate had cared what the people wanted they could have requested a full state recount. Neither did so, which makes it a moot point. Bush wanted the tally to stand and Gore wanted to cherry pick the counties to recount. As I see it, the SC made the only real decision it could under the circumstances.
Hopefully the fiasco will not occur again.
very well said!