Watching a president tank:( (bush)

Status
Not open for further replies.
BOB

What is Mikey Moore's home phone number? It appears he calls you every morning to give you talking points.

The US will do 1000% better at policing the world than the UN has done. The UN knew Iraq was paying off France Germany and Russia to kill any resolutions against them pre-war and did nothing about it.

You Dem's say there was proof Saddam had no WMD pre war. Then why didn't he just say come on in and look?!?! Why did he spend the entire time the UN inspectors were there blocking them from looking at anything that looked like a prime target. Why did he kick out the inspectors if he had nothing to hide?
 
Saddam wated to be bigger than life, and didnt believe the US would really attack. It also inflated his appearance in tjhe mid east.

obviously he was wrong all around.
 
hey bobbo,

old " baby stalin" milosevich keeled over yesterday, i hope the commie was in hell an hour before the lord knew he was dead. i know bob , he never attacked another country, so he is on the dems "good ole boy lists".. hell, kerry ought to go to the landfill...oops the funeral to see him off......LOL
 
shane,

the polls mean nothing, he isnt up for election. he isnt the prime minister that has to have elections if he tanks too far . this is america, not bloody old england, or our frozen friends up north.

iraq public opinions???? did they poll them too???
 
Bob Haller said:
Saddam wated to be bigger than life, and didnt believe the US would really attack. It also inflated his appearance in tjhe mid east.

obviously he was wrong all around.

He was VERY wrong. But I know that's 100% Bush's fault in your mind. Everyone looked at the same Intel and voted to go to war, but on the "brain dead" President fooled the entire world(makes people calling him a liar look even more stupid). Until the world finds out what was really on the "humanitarian" planes that flew into the Sudan while France bought saddam time in the UN we will not be able to say for sure what WMD there was.

Saddam was told by France Germany and Russia that no war would ever happen as long as he kept paying them the money from the UN oil for food scam. That is why we had to do it alone.

I just find it strange that the dems think Iraq was wrong but they want us to invade Iran China and North Korea.

If the war is such a blood bath to our troops, please explain the fact that more people were murdered in the city of New Orleans in 2005 YTD BEFORE Katrina hit than American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan COMBINED!!! Why do you dems never touch this fact?
 
dragon002 said:
shane,

the polls mean nothing, he isnt up for election. he isnt the prime minister that has to have elections if he tanks too far . this is america, not bloody old england, or our frozen friends up north.

iraq public opinions???? did they poll them too???


So when the polls show public support of the administration and their policies, it's a "mandate" which justifies everything they do...and when they show the American peole do NOT support them, it means nothing. How nice for them.

No, it's not an election year for HIM, you are correct. But it is still a Democracy, and Congress and the Senate sure are concerned, I'll guarantee you.

Oh, and there is impeachment he might be concerned with. Or censure (as per today's story on Mr. Feingold's initiative). Sure, he hasn't enjoyed a sex scandal, but there are those six or seven other matters that actually affected national security and peoples' lives (and deaths)... He'll be one for the history books alright. I'll back up the Fox crowd on that--just not for the reasons they're purporting. Poor McCain (a man I admire), he must be wringing his hands he didn't clobber George during the primaries--his country and his party are going down the tubes because of this fool.
 
Last edited:
shanewalker said:
So when the polls show public support of the administration and their policies, it's a "mandate" which justifies everything they do...and when they show the American peole do NOT support them, it means nothing. How nice for them.

No, it's not an election year for HIM, you are correct. But it is still a Democracy, and Congress and the Senate sure are concerned, I'll guarantee you.

Oh, and there is impeachment he might be concerned with. Or censure (as per today's story on Mr. Feingold's initiative). Sure, he hasn't enjoyed a sex scandal, but there are those six or seven other matters that actually affected national security and peoples' lives (and deaths)... He'll be one for the history books alright. I'll back up the Fox crowd on that--just not for the reasons they're purporting. Poor McCain (a man I admire), he must be wringing his hands he didn't clobber George during the primaries--his country and his party are going down the tubes because of this fool.


shane,

the election of 2004 validated everything they do. not the polls.

the GOP will NOT lose control of congress, take that to the bank.

i lived in arizona for 6 years, goldwater was a God there. the mistake McCain made was trying to reach out to the mod dems, in an open primary state, and the party faithful will never forgive him for that.

BTW shane, the poll was not only gallop poll, it was CNN/USA TODAY-GALLOP, and i cant seem to find the demographics listed, WHY???

is it possible it was 34% GOP and 60% dunb -ass??
 
Eric Goempel said:
He was VERY wrong. But I know that's 100% Bush's fault in your mind. Everyone looked at the same Intel and voted to go to war, but on the "brain dead" President fooled the entire world(makes people calling him a liar look even more stupid). Until the world finds out what was really on the "humanitarian" planes that flew into the Sudan while France bought saddam time in the UN we will not be able to say for sure what WMD there was.

Saddam was told by France Germany and Russia that no war would ever happen as long as he kept paying them the money from the UN oil for food scam. That is why we had to do it alone.

I just find it strange that the dems think Iraq was wrong but they want us to invade Iran China and North Korea.

If the war is such a blood bath to our troops, please explain the fact that more people were murdered in the city of New Orleans in 2005 YTD BEFORE Katrina hit than American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan COMBINED!!! Why do you dems never touch this fact?


Because NY has draconian gun control laws that don't work, that's why.
 
bob,

JESUS! we are not killing them, they are killing each other.

WTF is your point????????????????

and if we pull out a lot more will die!!!

again what is your point??

oh and BTW, you are claiming that more died during "OUR" war, there are mass graves containing 40,000 in ONE GRAVE , he killed over 350,000 iraqis and, how many more kuwaities? how many more kurds? how many more iranians (as if i care)

GET A GRIP,,,,OK????? W gave hope to 50 million people.
 
Last edited:
we set the stage that allow the terrorists. it was our responsiblity to take care of the citizens.
 
dragon002 said:
the GOP will NOT lose control of congress, take that to the bank.

are you interested in a bet on this? Please note my last bet was with dan collins owner of dbsforums. We REALLY enjoyed the $50 nite out.....


If your interested we can talk details:)
 
Bob Haller said:
More innocent civilians have died in Iraq since saddam was deposed than during all of saddams rule.

Saddam also ket essential services like power and water on, something thats currently not true.

poll info

http://news.aol.com/dailypulse/031306?id=20060313104209990001&ncid=NWS00010000000001

You really think that this is true? I want to see your facts on this.

I for one think the Kurds would disagree with that statement.

As for the power and water, it was bad before the war started. Have you ever been to Iraq Bob? I have and it was more of a mess then than now. I don't care what the idiots in the press or their stupid polls say.
 
Last edited:
Bob Haller said:
we set the stage that allow the terrorists. it was our responsiblity to take care of the citizens.


bob.... pull your head out of your lib *ss

move to florida, please!

you live in the burgh, ya weigh 300 lbs and are a commie wanna be

you dont like guns, yeah, let de fazio protect you (and im italian)

how does someone live in the burgh and not drink?

do you watch PRO FOOTBALL?

im really trying to understand you. they beat people like you up in the south hills! and they are DEMOCRATS!
 
Bob Haller said:
Saddam also ket essential services like power and water on, something thats currently not true.

Maybe it has a little to do with the fact that they are TARGETING the infrastructure.
while Saddam was in power they would have simply been killed.

Oh wait according to you saddam did nothing wrong in his life. You are one twisted person.
 
shanewalker said:
Oh, and there is impeachment he might be concerned with. Or censure (as per today's story on Mr. Feingold's initiative)

Please, you can't be serious? Anyone who lends any credibility to that non-threat really is smoking something. It's laughable posturing at best. Even crazy Pelosi didn't have the stones to support Feingold.
 
Last edited:
Saddam was a BAD guy, but even a rotten dictator knows to keep essential services going. note too the NEW iraq president is exceuting people again. so if you lived in iraq which would you prefer?>

A iraq dictator who kept things going, not pergect by any means.

or a occupying army thats unable to provide security, didnt plan to prevent looting after deposing the bad dictator, and hasnt seen to essentials like water and power.

the fact theres a civil war going on is altogether understandable:(

The US BLEW IT COMPLETELY!

Remember bush said mission accomplished:(

Incidently I DONT weigh 300 pounds anymore:) Actually I was born in phoenix az, both of my parents were originally from pittsburgh.
 
Last edited:
Bob Haller said:
Saddam was a BAD guy, but even a rotten dictator knows to keep essential services going. note too the NEW iraq president is exceuting people again. so if you lived in iraq which would you prefer?>

A iraq dictator who kept things going, not pergect by any means.

or a occupying army thats unable to provide security, didnt plan to prevent looting after deposing the bad dictator, and hasnt seen to essentials like water and power.

the fact theres a civil war going on is altogether understandable:(

The US BLEW IT COMPLETELY!

Remember bush said mission accomplished:(

This just isn't true, there is not a civil war going on. There are people from outside of Iraq starting a civil war, there is not a civil war yet. Bob, please understand I'm not trying to say that the problems in Iraq are small, or that they don't exist. But as I've told you before I've been to Iraq, the country was a mess even before the first Gulf war. The dictator spent more money on building up his military, his palaces, his own pockets than he did on rebuilding his country after the Afgan war.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Beatles Box April 11

Accepting credit cards

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)