Except those with antennas.Which is dumb because us with Dish aren't seeing the story.
Except those with antennas.Which is dumb because us with Dish aren't seeing the story.
Shhhhh !! Don't let them know that. Let them spend (waste) their money doing it and thinking it may work.Which is dumb because us with Dish aren't seeing the story.
TV stations try and tell people that using antennas are an option but you can be sure, they really don't want everyone to go that route. It would effectively cut their revenue in half if they lost the carriage fees that they receive from local cablecos, Dish, and Directv.Except those with antennas.
Ironically, with Strike Zone and my friends with Extra Innings, I'm not missing much of Cubs games at all. In fact, a portion of Chicago based subs aren't musing any WGN programming with OTA. It's a sad day when you can get the games on your RSN, but not on the "free" OTA outlet
Is there somewhere official this has been mentioned and I've missed it, or just speculation online?
While I agree locals would probably prefer to get the retrans money, I'm not sure how much the retrans money brings in vs. ad money. You may be right, it may be around half, but I'm not convinced.TV stations try and tell people that using antennas are an option but you can be sure, they really don't want everyone to go that route. It would effectively cut their revenue in half if they lost the carriage fees that they receive from local cablecos, Dish, and Directv.
You managed to save a quarter per month on your Dish bill? Great job!I also believe DISH is getting very desperate too..........I called today to cancel as DTV is scheduled to be installed tomorrow and DISH cut my bill down by a 1/4 per month.
That must have been very early in 2012. I think we all remember the whole AMC ordeal.I'll agree to disagree. When a company loses a record number of Subs (281K Total btwn Dish/SlingTV in 2nd Quarter) then it's called being desperate to retain additional subs at any reasonable cost.
When I left after 7 plus years in 2012 in good standing as they called it, they offered me only 5 movie coupons and there were no big carriage disputes then on DISH. This was also via Loyalty Department. I said thanks, but no thanks.
While I agree locals would probably prefer to get the retrans money, I'm not sure how much the retrans money brings in vs. ad money. You may be right, it may be around half, but I'm not convinced.
Media research company SNL Kagan says total TV retrans dollars will rise to $3.61 billion in 2017 from a $1.14 billion total in 2010.
Research and ad-buying firm Magna Global predicts TV ad revenue for 2016 will grow 0.5% to $63 billion
While those numbers are overall numbers I would suspect that local dollars have close to the same ratio.
Affiliates send at least half of that back to the Network in reverse compensation. The only ones keeping it all are the Network Owned and Operated stations and any independent non network stations.
Using those numbers, retrans would be ~5% of income. Slightly less than than the "half" claimed earlier.Media research company SNL Kagan says total TV retrans dollars will rise to $3.61 billion in 2017 from a $1.14 billion total in 2010.
Research and ad-buying firm Magna Global predicts TV ad revenue for 2016 will grow 0.5% to $63 billion
While those numbers are overall numbers I would suspect that local dollars have close to the same ratio.
Dish has talked about WGN not worth what is now being asked and not popular enough. They did say it is being bundled with all the locals and that it shouldn't be. Certainly seems that is holding up all the locals. I don't remember if double the cost was mentioned.
You managed to save a quarter per month on your Dish bill? Great job!
That must have been very early in 2012. I think we all remember the whole AMC ordeal.
Is there somewhere official this has been mentioned and I've missed it, or just speculation online?
Sounds like Jon Oliver has a new show subject to help push FCC in the direction of the consumer.