Just to be clear Satellite is my first choice for TV and I would have Directv if I didn't want DISH.
But dude, you have zero understanding of the pricing of Directv and DISH then. I am paying $26 less and yes, for comparable and I broke it down a few months ago. Top250 HBO, two HD DVR receivers each with three tuners two satellite and one OTA. (It was actually a little less of a savings then but Directv has become even more expensive)
You just sound foolish making a post you made up, and have no idea how much can be saved.
Beyond that, lets throw out comparable and going with your insistence that it isn't comparable. Then answer this, why doesn't Directv or Cable offer an alternative so that people can spend less and then be comparable? Why does DISH have more choices to spend less? Why does DISH have what many would say is the best new receiver? Partly because the money saved in negotiations does go back into the business. They are working on lowering bills withing the framework of high cost to them (and everyone) for programming especially sports.