Coming.
The same answer when asked on 5/30/08, when would be a contempt?
Coming.
The same answer when asked on 5/30/08, when would be a contempt?
Sorry that some development is involved in putting out a new product.
It'll be out before this case is over.
Sorry proof by clear and convincing evidence is involved too
It may never come out once this contempt issue is over.
Have you personally read the patents?NOT ONE SINGLE WORD HAS BEEN CHANGED ANYWHERE!
Reasonable questions. Thank you HobbyTalk.Comcast has had theirs out for over a year in a number of markets. Comcast has more subscribers then D*. Comcast's standard Moto DVR sucks badly. MSO numbers have not shot up over the past year. People are not willing to pay even $3 a month extra that Comcast wants to cover the TiVo tax. Will D* customers be willing to pay $5 a month extra to cover the TiVo tax?
Not one single word of TiVo's patent has ever been found to be invalid. Not by the USPTO, not by a judge, not by a jury, or anyone else. You are misinformed.Have you personally read the patents?
The patents contain lots of obscure diagrams and definitions relating to hardware and software. Some portions didn't stand in this case.
The HD-Directv TIVO is Vaporware
TiVO sucks anyway. Given the choice between my HR20-100 and a TiVO, I wold choose the HR.
Had the same HR20 for the last 2 years and never had a single issue. 2 TiVO's, both missed recordings, both would reset for no reason, and the interface is the worst of any DVR (Every task involves multiple steps and navigation through multiple folders).So would I. For a doorstop....
I'm on my third HR in less than 2 years. You can keep that piece of junk.
I thought this thread was about the court case.Had the same HR20 for the last 2 years and never had a single issue. 2 TiVO's, both missed recordings, both would reset for no reason, and the interface is the worst of any DVR (Every task involves multiple steps and navigation through multiple folders).
Have you personally read the patents?
The patents contain lots of obscure diagrams and definitions relating to hardware and software. Some portions didn't stand in this case.
So would I. For a doorstop....
I'm on my third HR in less than 2 years. You can keep that piece of junk.
Had the same HR20 for the last 2 years and never had a single issue. 2 TiVO's, both missed recordings, both would reset for no reason, and the interface is the worst of any DVR (Every task involves multiple steps and navigation through multiple folders).
Had the same HR20 for the last 2 years and never had a single issue. 2 TiVO's, both missed recordings, both would reset for no reason, and the interface is the worst of any DVR (Every task involves multiple steps and navigation through multiple folders).
The DirecTiVo box, when and if it ever comes out, will still be basically the same DirecTV developed hardware running a TiVo developed UI. If you think you had problems with hardware and software that was developed by a single company, what makes you think that hardware developed by one company loaded with software that was developed and then modified to use someone else's hardware has any chance of being more stable?
The first thing I did when I got my first TiVO was to turn that annoying noise off.But... but.... TiVo has that awesome "boop" sound!
Originally NDS did the software for the D* boxes, but in recent months DirecTV has taken over all development and all the HR2X's now have DirecTV code, not NDS.Uh, did I miss something? Isn't the current HR20 hardware developed by DirecTV with NDS doing the software? So isn't TiVo just replacing NDS?
In other words, didn't your entire argument just go up in smoke?