Yawn...here we go again...for your entertainment, everyone...
As if the above statement needs some in depth legal background to make? Anyone doing business inside the US must obey the US patent law, what was your point again?
Go back and read it...
None of the above your new predictions has anything to do with your initial prediction that the judge will rule complete in TiVo's favor.
On 1), now your prediction is there will be a settlement, which will be E*'s ideal situation. Did you just rule out your previous prediction that TiVo will get everything from the judge?
What about 2)? What are you talking about the infringement will finally stick? Have you not already learned the infringement verdict was final after the Supreme Court refused to hear E*? Which infringement verdict did you mean that did not stick and needed to be stuck again?
Here we go with the famous myoung flim-flam speech....
1) This was a prediction I made a LONG time ago (in case you remembered...you obviously didn't)...you may not recall, but I included it here only because I did say it a while back and I'm owning up to in now in the present. Its still a possiblity, but I'm not as confident that will be the case given the current state of affairs in the world.
2) This is my most recent prediction given the U.S. 'regime change', the global economy worsening, and the focus on globalization that I'm sure is going to happen as a result of it. Given Folsoms ties with Bill, this is definitiely a possibility.
I'm not stuck in the slightest. Perhaps you didn't hear...I'm sorry, but there has been no ruling as to whether or not the new DVRs infringe or not...I'm glad I can be the first to tell you. You see, eventually there will be a FINAL decision here...and it hasn't happened yet. But when it does, I'm sure it will be a winner-take-all thing that deals with creative 'work arounds' by either Dish, D* or anyone else.
What vision? You could not even spell out such vision, rather change your predcition as you go along.
I spelled it out quite clear...its your 'lack of vision' that is the problem...you want to desparately believe things about me that, sadly, aren't true. All your posts consists of are personal attacks against me, lies, slander, and you making up things as you go about what you think I mean or am saying...instead of just READING it. I don't waste words like you. My thoughts are clear, consise, and to the point. Maybe its your habit of wasting words that is causing you to search for complexity where none exists...
You never had a point, every time I poked a hole in your so called breadth of legal knowledge, you changed your point, and you still do not have a point sadly.
When have you poked a whole in anything? You've been arguing with yourself this whole dang time leaving my point alone completely! lol...the only one who keeps changing what my point supposedly is, is YOU! LMAO!! I've only elaborated on certain elements to make it clearer for you so you don't have to continue fabricating things, and gave you a little history in case you might actually remember some of it...
You are not helping your case any, you problem is entirely personal here and you are doing little to redeem yourself. The fact that you've made it so personal can only be an indication of one thing...
...you've already lost a long time ago.
Go with God, jacmyoung...
