Because with out hope of a cure or the eventual end of the zombies and a place for them to start over, the human race that was left would give up and eventually just end it. Without hope there is no reason to go on. That is true in any show and in real life as well. Besides they already came upon a scientist from the CDC in Atlanta in the first season. There is no reason why they couldn't come upon a government scientist who is working frantically to cure the world of the virus and they might know what caused it in the first place.
Watching a gore-fest each week is getting old and really only appeals to the lowest common element or baser instinct of the human race or viewers out there. It doesn't have to be more than a 5 - 10 minute conversation with someone in the know, who could fill the characters on the show in ,as well as the viewers like me who are interested.
Even on Resident Evil ,they still have the Umbrella organization still running things from behind the curtain and they know what caused it etc. They give you an explanation about the virus and you still get to see all the gore you like . All I am asking for was a little about what caused it, can it be cured and you could throw in some freebies like we have already talked about.
#1. Where does the human meat the zombies eat go ?-Since the zombies can't digest anything because they are DEAD?
#2 How long does a zombie last before it breaks down and rots to nothing but a skeleton?
Give me a little background story on these issues and I could enjoy the show more. Without it , it is just gory deaths one after another with a soap opera plot.
I guess I just don't see how knowing what caused the virus changes the show in any way. Even if they would have found out what caused this from the CDC guy back in season 1 how would anything be different? I don't see how them hearing how it all started would have changed anything for them. They would still be in the same situation they are now.
I guess it's possible that some genius could figure out how to make some kind of vaccine with no technology. Then what? How do you distribute that to small pockets of survivors living all over the world? Even if you can create a vaccine that stops the living from turning and find a way to mass produce and distribute that still doesn't stop the ones who are already zombies from eating you. The dead far outnumber the living at this point and there is no government or infrastructure left.
You don't like the show. That doesn't mean it only appeals to the lowest element of viewers. It just means it doesn't appeal to you. It's not just a gore fest. Gore is part of it but what you still don't understand is that the show is about a group of survivors living in a zombie apocalypse. It's about them not the zombies. The creators have said this in countless interviews at this point. A group of survivors living in an apocalyptic world is interesting to some of us even if there were no zombies at all. I loved Jericho and to me these are similar shows. You can take Jericho's nuclear attack and replace it with a zombie apocalypse and you get a pretty similar show.
I don't buy the hope thing either. Because you can't cure everyone else you don't want you and your family to survive? Sure some people would probably take the easy way out but that doesn't mean everyone would. If you live long enough eventually most of the zombies might decay to the point where they can't hurt you. That is probably the closest thing you are going to get to hope for society's recovery.
Last edited: