Tampa8 said:I am giving you the post of the year award. That sums it up. Somehow the nonsense has to end. Great post. :
This should be post of the year!Obviously you don't know what you are talking about. DirecTV has more HD channels than Dish Network. They also have much better picture quality. Why would you pay for hd lite?
And what can they really say?They probably dont have any info
Obviously you don't know what you are talking about. DirecTV has more HD channels than Dish Network. They also have much better picture quality. Why would you pay for hd lite?
Hemi 6.1 said:This should be post of the year!
The most unresearched post.
Both Satellite companys are HD -Lite.
2nd we've done number after number of HD channel counts and if you want to count HD channels that remain blank 90% of the time, then Yes D* is Number 1 in HD alternet RSN's
Prove it right now!DirecTV is not HD-lite. Dish Network is. You're wrong. You apparently have no idea what HD-lite even is.
Hemi 6.1 said:Prove it right now!
Just because Dish HD Lite is Lighter doesn't mean Directv isn't HD lite!Haha. So you really are that dim? You don't even know what it is. Come on Hemi...you're the one with something to prove. Everyone else already knows about the 1080i channels Dish has and that they are not full resolution.
Hemi 6.1 said:Just because Dish HD Lite is Lighter doesn't mean Directv isn't HD lite!
Again this Thread has nothing to do with D* HD PQ that is just a Fraction better then E*.
Again Back it up!Haha. Oh my...you've just proven it once again. HD-lite is when the resolution is shaved down. All of DirecTV's HD channels are full resolution. None of the 1080i channels with Dish Network are. DirecTV also delivers channels with higher average bit rates. DirecTV has better picture quality and 30+ more HD channels than Dish Network.
Hemi 6.1 said:Again Back it up!
Lets not forget who got Sued over HD lite and Who didn't.