Sat System Structure Optimization

Status
Please reply by conversation.
I assume they will, if connected to a Front-end device or even remote AV Receiver, but quality of sound may be lower than via a thick speaker wire directly from an AV Receiver. It all depends on model specs of course, but wireless speakers presume integrated in them audio amplifier, which specs are usually lower than of an AV Receiver. As to RCA-to-Stereo Cable, it again requires an integrated with Speaker System Audio Amplifier. I'm talking about better quality stand alone speakers like Klipsch, Polk, Yamaha...
 
Last edited:
Nice thread BTW.

Connecting an OTA or CATV signal with your satellite signal is achieved using Diplexers. I would recommend using Solid Copper Core coaxial and compression connectors on all ends. The integrity of signal will be preserved better than using Copper Clad Steel coaxial.

Here is a picture of the WFS-14 5x4 Kathrein Feed In Diplexer.

You can use this 4-way diplexer to feed in terrestrial or CATV signals in conjunction with the satellite feed system. Integrated is a 4-way splitter for the terrestrial signals. High signal decoupling thanks to the use of frequency diplexers. Compact construction. For indoor mounting.
 

Attachments

  • WFS-14-222291.jpg
    WFS-14-222291.jpg
    128.2 KB · Views: 130
  • SDC5403.jpg
    SDC5403.jpg
    45.8 KB · Views: 142
I still have to comprehend it by portions so. Still what seems to be missing is integrated speakers solution. From what you described, one can use TV Speakers only for this to work. If one wants to use a stand along speaker set in a room, he should run a speaker wire from the central area, where AV Receiver is located, and it won't be a part of the whole LAN-based distro system, despite possibly being controlled (I assume) from each room via a Remote to Sage or MythTV Front-end device. Only if one uses a PC with Audio Card with integrated amplifier as a Front-end Device in a room, he'll be able to connect speaker wire directly to it. :rolleyes:

We don't use any TV speakers in any room. I won't even go into the speaker systems as that would be a thread of its own. Some rooms have pre-pros that feed arrays of amplifiers, others have preamps with amps or A/V receivers. The Sage HD Media Extenders have video through HDMI, component, S-Video and composite while audio is through HDMI, optical or RCA phono, so you can integrate this with just about anything. Alternately you can run the Sage client on PCs and Macs and use one of these to feed your video and/or audio systems if you prefer media PCs in some or all the rooms.

Another thing, I wanted to ask about, why did you put all the eggs into RAID systems - is it because of high value of the collection, or speed required to record HD programs?

The vast majority of what we do is HD video or real HD audio (24 bit, high rate, uncompressed). Both take a lot of space. I suppose I could archive some of this onto regular DVDs, red laser HD DVDs or recordable Blu-Rays but that would take a lot more of my time and potentially require recompression, that I would like to avoid. I'm busy enough expanding the system and keeping it running. Optical storage might even cost more and have little if any redundancy. I think it will soon be obsolete.

Speed is a secondary consideration, but with all the data going to and fro it helps. Some HD feeds can be 30-40 Mbps and that's cooking. On occasions when there is only one shot to get a critically desired feed, I may have 3-4 receivers running off of more than one dish and in some cases more than one satellite, just in case. The numbers can add up real fast.

I haven't found large RAIDs to be that expensive because we would probably use them even if we didn't have a media server solution. I'm projecting I will get 5+ years of life from one RAID set, because I will hand down the big RAID disks on the media server to the smaller RAID on the file server when the former fills up. This makes migrating easy as long as I leave a little space before doing the ping-pong. I don't trust the RAID completely and have a LTO-4 tape system for backups.

I guess if you look at the fact that we have something over 30 computers in the house and many of them are diskless, the savings in drives for each computer largely pays for the RAIDs and is a lot more useful.
 
Sadoun

Interesting Combiner... From the schematics shown I take it that a DiSEqC Switch must be connected btw smaller Diplexer and a Sat Receiver? Will it work if connected to more than one dish, including a motorized one? Should the Combiner be the first device after coax entering the house in that scenario? Will it pass through signals to control a motor and LNBs switching?

pendragon

This whole thing you described reminded me Bill Gates' house, where new Total PC Controlled Home solutions were being refined and tested. I suspect, you have something like that towards video surveillance, garage door, kitchen equipment control, etc. :)

What do you use that many PCs for?
 
Last edited:
This whole thing you described reminded me Bill Gates' house, where new Total PC Controlled Home solutions were being refined and tested. I suspect, you have something like that towards video surveillance, garage door, kitchen equipment control, etc. :)

What do you use that many PCs for?

I'm not into home automation, but I was into music and high-end audio professionally, and over time this got me into high-end video. There's a lot in those directions but little else.

A number of years ago we were the repeated victims of some teenage vandalism on our property, and that prompted the development of a rather covert perimeter control system. I haven't spent much time enhancing it after it nailed the kid. One of our kids has an server controlled weather observation system. That's about it.

Now I do a lot of high-performance computing work at home, which leads to some of the computers. My wife and I each have a Mac and PC and the kids each have a Mac. Most of the other rooms have at least one computer, and some of the A/V systems have two. Then there are the servers. Granted we rarely have more than half of the machines turned on, but the total count adds up.
 
pendragon said:
I've been able to integrate OTA, DN and FTA receivers with a centralized Sage server and a separate media server.
One of the key points in your system, we almost missed. Then I looked at SageTV site, and it hit me: how do I get all these signals into Sage TV Server?

I think, some of these signals in your setup come from Sat PC Cards mounted in the server. But what about others, like (I assume) decoded OTA and DN Sat signals? NTSC & ATSC & QAM PC Card for OTA? OK, you can (sometimes) manually control each FTA receiver by its own Remote for scanning channels, and use a slaved sat card via SageTV for tuning in its signals. Would the pic quality be better decoded by the receiver as opposed to a sat card? What about the DN receiver - how to integrate that one? And how do you control the motor and switches from the server - via coax runs from each Sat Card? They're known to be picky on that.

Also, when 6 people watch different sats on 6 TVs, to manage it all, how many sat cards do you need? What models to cover all signal modes & modulations? I assume, SageTV has a cap on number of connected devices? What specs the server needs to have to manage them all? Something is not right here...:rolleyes:

On top of that, how did you integrate your OTA, DN and FTA receivers with a media server for recording - via the SageTV server?

How your Media Extenders are connected - via Routers? It looks, to service that big network with adequate for HDTV speed, you need something bigger then a home (wireless) router? Sorry for so many question - we almost missed these points, adding quite extra cost and complexity to the system. :)
 
Last edited:
One of the key points in your system, we almost missed. Then I looked at SageTV site, and it hit me: how do I get all these signals into Sage TV Server?

I think, some of these signals in your setup come from Sat PC Cards mounted in the server. But what about others, like (I assume) decoded OTA and DN Sat signals? NTSC & ATSC & QAM PC Card for OTA? OK, you can (sometimes) manually control each FTA receiver by its own Remote for scanning channels, and use a slaved sat card via SageTV for tuning in its signals.

I did touch on this, but I'd be happy to expand the detail.

OTA is easy. There is a unit called HDHomeRun that has two OTA tuners and hangs off Ethernet. Normally it is designed to act as a server and one can run clients on Mac or PCs to connect to it and watch TV on the computer screen. But it also interfaces directly to Sage. Once you scan the channels with the HDHR software, Sage will read the list and associate them into its program guide. Whether you watch live or record through Sage, Sage will select one of the HDHR tuners, change the channel, take the transport stream and send it to one or more Media Extenders if required. We have only one HDHR because most of the A/V rooms had legacy ATSC STBs before we integrated Sage, but I believe one can add as many as one wants to a network. The HDHR handles all our recordings, and two tuners has been always enough for us.

DN is a little trickier. There is a company called Nextcom Wireless that makes a USB-based device that can feed the transport streams from a subscribed DN receiver into a PC. That also interfaces directly to Sage. You need to tweak a Sage-supplied DN channel list to what you subscribe to, and then Sage will turn on the receiver, tune to the correct channel and start accepting the TS, all through the USB cable. This works the same as OTA: you can watch live or set up recordings. At the moment we have two DN receivers controlled by Sage and might consider adding a third.

It turns out the same type of device works with a subscribed 4DTV receiver, and we have one of those, too. If the 4DTV receiver is set up to be a BUD mover, I believe Sage can command it to move the dish to the proper satellite. We don't use that feature because the only 4DTV channels we watch are all HD and are on the same bird. The 4DTV receiver isn't the best to interface to a DiSEqC-based switching matrix, but I've developed some workarounds.

At the moment we have five USB/PCI receivers for FTA reception. For the most part we use a Windows app called DVB Dream with these because it has a Sage plug-in that works like any other Sage encoder: you set up a channel line up and Sage does the channel switching and pulls the transport stream. DVB Dream will do any necessary H/V/22 kHz/DiSEqC switching to get to the right dish, and has the capability to move a dish. Unfortunately because Sage considers all the receivers to be in a pool, and because of the design limitations of DiSEqc, it's hard to get this to work for more than one receiver.

Instead I have one USB receiver on Linux that drives all the dish positioning through an open source app to which I've made major changes. As this experiment was quite successful, I'm planning on moving all the FTA receivers to Linux eventually by writing a Sage network encoder myself. With a little glue, this will allow Sage to drive all the C-band dishes positioning and provide a means to choose the best dish from the pool for any given set of user requests. MythTV, which has some of the capabilities of Sage, also has Linux drivers for the Nextcom devices. I may adapt this code to work as a Sage network encoder.

These happen to be the Sage network encoders that work for us. There are actually many others that probably work as well. What I like about our setup is all of the original transport streams are untouched through the whole process. They go effectively directly from the receiver to the Media Extender rendering unit, and that goes HDMI to the screens. Audio stays digital until output to the amps.

Would the pic quality be better decoded by the receiver as opposed to a sat card? What about the DN receiver - how to integrate that one?

None of the PC-based receiver cards we use have built-in codecs. Normally their supplied software would use SW or HW decoding on the PC for rendering. We don't need this at all, because the Sage server sends the transport streams to the Sage HD Media Extenders that do all the video decoding in HW. The quality of the video is extremely good from these units, and definitely better than from our STB FTA receiver and especially the DN receivers. On our 160" screen, these differences are obvious. Again all video stays in its original digital format all the way to the Media Extenders. No transcoding, conversion to analog, etc. Before Sage, I used to run PCs and Macs as media rendering devices. They were horrible with dropped frames, tearing, juddering and everything else you can imagine. I tried the latest nVidia and ATI cards with the best HW rendering I could find and it still was lousy. This is another universe.

See above for the DN receiver integration answer.

And how do you control the motor and switches from the server - via coax runs from each Sat Card? They're known to be picky on that.

As described earlier, DiSEqC limitations make it difficult for any receiver from a pool to move any dish. Instead I have a master USB receiver on Linux that moves all the dishes. The concept is that it is always the last in the Sage pool, so it will almost never get used to feed a transport stream. I haven't published my switch matrix design, but I pick off the motor commands for each dish and route these separately to either the BUD controllers (GBOX 3000s) or the Ku dish motor. No LNB signals go through the controllers or motors, and the Ku motor commands go through a separate coax line from the motor power (I did publish a thread on how to do this). Because of this design, the master USB receiver never supplies any direct power to drive a motor. It works perfectly every time.

Also, when 6 people watch different sats on 6 TVs, to manage it all, how many sat cards do you need? What models to cover all signal modes & modulations? I assume, SageTV has a cap on number of connected devices? What specs the server needs to have to manage them all? Something is not right here...:rolleyes:

As it stands, between the legacy ATSC tuners and the HDHR, there is always an OTA tuner for any screen in the house. It is possible to get into a DN conflict, especially if there are recordings being made while someone is watching live, but we've never had a problem. Still I might add one more DN receiver to the pool in the future. For FTA there are always four tuners available, even if the master receiver is held back. That's a lot of choices for six people. In fact if more than one is watching the same show, and even if they all are live time shifting in different ways, Sage will only use one tuner.

What makes this work smoothly is the ease of time-shifting through Sage. Almost all programs we watch were recorded earlier. Anyone anywhere can use any Media Extender to record any one of our sources from a program guide. Sage does the scheduling and warns if there will be a conflict. We almost never have any because of all the source choices and the sizes of the receiver pools. You can watch any recording anywhere. This is so much better than any PVR-based approach. Still when there is a critical FIFA match, the next episode of a stupid network show or someone wants the latest news from anywhere in the world, watching live is always a trivial option.

I'm not aware of any inherent Sage software limitations. We have run up to 10 network encoders at the same time. It worked perfectly on XP, but less so on Vista. The software RAID5 seems to be the culprit: it goes catatonic every once in a while before coming back to life 30 seconds later. I've tweaked it for several months and the hiccups are pretty much gone, but I've had enough of messing with crummy Windows software and drivers.

So the network encoders are going back to XP and the RAID is going to Linux. I hope to eventually eliminate the network encoder PC. Because these machines are primarily only moving data, there is very little CPU load. All the video decoding is done by the Media Extenders and the audio by the pre-pros. The PC hardware is unexceptional. I'm using some nice 3-year-old motherboards that were repurposed for both the Sage and Linux boxes.

On top of that, how did you integrate your OTA, DN and FTA receivers with a media server for recording - via the SageTV server?

As explained above, Sage controls everything, whether you watch live, record or play back a recording.

How your Media Extenders are connected - via Routers? It looks, to maintain that big network, you need something bigger then a standard router? Sorry for so many question - we almost missed these points, adding quite extra cost and complexity to the system. :)

When we moved into the house 14 years ago, I wired every room for Ethernet. Fortunately the cables handle GbE just fine. All of this runs out of our server room through a 48 port GbE switch, with a few satellite GbE switches for rooms with multiple computers/Media Extenders/other components that want connectivity. We have tons of bandwidth and the Linux RAIDs will read in excess of 500 MBytes/s each. I have six port GbE cards in the Linux servers and plan to gang multiple lines to the switches for higher data rates. Even a single port can do 100 Mbyte/s sustained. This isn't so much for media as for serving diskless machines. With this kind of network, those machines are even faster than if they had disks.

We do have a wireless network and have two ISPs for redundancy. The FreeBSD routers handle firewalling all the traffic between the two ISPs, the wired and the wireless LANs. I'm tough on security and the wireless network has many restrictions. The wireless network doesn't get used a lot, but comes in handy for laptops and visitors. I use it mostly for tuning dishes because I can haul my laptop out to the dishes and tunnel into the Linux world to see how well the receivers like my tweaks, and to move any dish to another position. I'm also planning to remote my bench spectrum analyzer for similar purposes, but until then I use a web cam on it to the laptop.

It may seem like this costs an extravagant amount, but I've had fun doing FTA on a shoestring budget. A lot of stuff has come for free, and I grab a lot of bargains off eBay. I imported the USB tuners from China myself and paid next to nothing for them, because no one in the US handled them at the time. This is one of the least expensive hobbies I've ever had, but of course my time comes for free.
 
I really don't have much to add, just wanted to comment on how interesting all of this information is. I thought I was doing good streaming my Divx movies from my Ubuntu box to my Xbox 360 using fuppes :) Definitely gives me a glimpse into some ideas I can use for future expansion.
 
pendragon

I'm kind of amazed that this forum comfortably accommodates not only FTA newbies, but also super pro FTA heroes like yourself. I need plenty of time now to research in more depth some things you mentioned. Guessing, you possibly need 30 PCs for software testing. Risking to sound too noisy, still managed to word some more questions (hope they won't be the last answered :)):

Given the complexity of your accomplished setup, how would you suggest to approach the task of planning optimal Switched Connections matrix to gather all signals in the receivers? What your switch matrix looks like in general? Also, where's the thread you mentioned on how to control a Motor by a separate coax?

What USB Receiver model for C and Ku band Dish control would you recommend? Also the device model you mentioned to control DN and other sub receivers via USB from Sage? If its R5000-HD, is there any cost attached to it?

Am I right, you don't put a lot of eggs into Windows 7 MC & TV Pack basket, preferring old XP instead? What exact Vista features seems to be a limitation for network encoders? Also, it seems SageTV can't run on Linux at all, yet you mentioned "Sage network encoders" a few times in conjunction with Windows and Linux. What is scope of their functions, are they OS independent?

Demonstrating my noob status again, how pre-pros works to get a better sound out of speakers? What pre-pros is, how it looks like, and how connected to the outside (I assume SageTV driven) world? Is there any post-pros following the pre-pros? Why would one need an "array of amplifiers" in a room, and also audio pre-amps to feed AV Receivers? :music: :shh
 
Last edited:
Given the complexity of your accomplished setup, how would you suggest to approach the task of planning optimal Switched Connections matrix to gather all signals in the receivers? What your switch matrix looks like in general?

At a high level, there's nothing unusual about it. I designed it to handle up to 128 LNB inputs, although I never expect to get that high. My basic requirement was any receiver needs to be able to switch to any available LNB and polarization without regard to any other receiver. All of my LNBs have dedicated outputs, so all polarizations are always available.

Because I wanted to minimize the toroid complexity, I decided to go with bandstacked LNBs there, but that puts a premium on switching because a lot of m x n switches can't go above 1450 MHz. I finally found some WNC 4x8 switches that work over the full 950-2150 MHz range, and they're also easy to modify to have all 18V supplies to the LNBs:

http://www.satelliteguys.us/fta-shack/174802-naughty-mods-ii-4x8-switch-all-18v-outputs.html

I then combined these switches with DisEqC 4x1 committed and 8x1 uncommitted switches to feed the receivers. It worked out slightly differently in real life, but basically one can imagine a master switch panel that has eight DisEqC 4x1 committed switches, one per receiver. Then there are up to four slave switch panels that each handle 32 LNBs. With toroids I wanted to place these panels as close to the dishes so I only had to run 8 lines to the master panel from each slave panel. Each slave panel has eight of the WNC 4x8 switches, which are fed by the LNBs. The 4x8s then feed eight DisEqC 8x1 uncommitted switches, one per receiver. The outputs of the 8x1s are trunked to the master panel.

There are grimy details like extracting the motor commands, and for starters I'm going with one slave panel, but putting three 4x8s on the master to get me up to 44 LNBs. I'll have a few open inputs, but I'm hoping to avoid expanding this for awhile as I have some non-FTA projects to pursue when this is done. I plan to publish photos, diagrams and some how-tos after the work is complete, so I'm going to leave this as it is.

Also, where's the thread you mentioned on how to control a Motor by a separate coax?

http://www.satelliteguys.us/fta-shack/174799-naughty-mods-i-dg-380-separate-drive-power.html

What USB Receiver model for C and Ku band Dish control would you recommend? Also the device model you mentioned to control DN and other sub receivers via USB from Sage? If its R5000-HD, is there any cost attached to it?

I'm using four DVB World 2104 USB devices and one TechnoTrend TT-3200 PCI unit. All seem to work fine for me and DVB Dream works pretty well with all of them. I didn't try any others. The R5000-HD is the DN interface, and it's pricey. I did the installs myself and saved some nice coin on each. You also have to buy their Sage SW, but that handles up to four units.

Am I right, you don't put a lot of eggs into Windows 7 MC & TV Pack basket, preferring old XP instead? What exact Vista features seems to be a limitation for network encoders? Also, it seems SageTV can't run on Linux at all, yet you mentioned "Sage network encoders" a few times in conjunction with Windows and Linux. What is scope of their functions, are they OS independent?

I hate all computers and their OSes. XP seemed to work fine with the Sage encoders, and the only reason I had to go to Vista was to get GPT partitions (no 2TB limit) on the RAID. The SW RAID may be more of a problem than Vista, but there were a lot of minor incompatibilities and bugs for the apps and drivers I was running just fine on XP. Many of these I fixed or worked around, but Vista bought me absolutely nothing but wasted time. As XP does the job for the Sage encoders, I'm going back to it. No reason to waste more time on Windows 7. I never have a problem leaving a special purpose machine on an old OS if it's never going to change. I plan to get rid of the XP machine in the future.

Sage will run on Linux, but one still needs some kind of network encoder to get the data in. Using Windows network encoders with a Linux Sage server app can be made to work, but it's more bother than I want. Hence my plan to virtualize the Sage server app running in XP on one of my Linux servers. The XP box running the encoders can talk to a Windows Sage and stay happy. The Sage network encoder interface is pretty basic. I expect it will only take me a day or two to write one running native on Linux for the FTA receivers if I ever get a chance. If I can do the same for the R5000s, I may be able to eliminate Windows from the Sage equation.

Demonstrating my noob status again, how pre-pros works to get a better sound out of speakers? What pre-pros is, how it looks like, and how connected to the outside (I assume SageTV driven) world? Is there any post-pros following the pre-pros? Why would one need an "array of amplifiers" in a room, and also audio pre-amps to feed AV Receivers? :music: :shh

A pre-pro is just a preamp-processor. There are a handful of nice ones that take tons of A/V inputs and do the audio decoding, transcode or switch video and in some cases have a fairly sophisticated processing capability to deal with non-7.1 recordings. We have a few of these. We also have some old style preamp-amp combos for the non-video systems in the house. And we have a number of A/V receivers, about half of which have their internal amps turned off so we can use better outboard units. Recall I used to do pro audio in a past life. That means some of the speaker systems make our Sage, FTA and servers systems look like kindergarten. The main speaker system requires seven dual channel amps to power it. All but one of these are customs amps I designed that can toss out 2 kW per channel. The smaller systems aren't quite as excessive, but still are pretty sophisticated. Yes, there are other audio and video processors to handle unusual situations and optimize the A/V experience.
 
Last edited:
I really appreciate unique for a public forum extensive high value input you friendly provided. :angel:

I personally need some time now to run it through my lightly trained post-pros. This thread shouldn't be lost among myriad of trivia. Probably better moved to FAQ Section Sticky? It highlights one of the major starting points in setting up FTA system, and goes uniquely deep into the topic. I'm sure, other advanced members will keep contributing with their input. :up :up :up
 
I agree , should be a sticky. Pendragon has done a fantastic job detailling all this. I am still reading and learning. Thanks a lot.
 
I wanted to ask the guys who reported success on this forum with Multifeed Setup:

Why did you prefer Multiple dishes with several LNBs on each to a motorized single LNB setup? What are the advantages and drawbacks of both for you personally?

Did you every consider a mixed setup like a Motorized 2-or-3 LNB dish? Anyone can report success in that department? Why did you prefer this setup to other options?
 
Wireless. Don't get me started on wireless.

IMO, It just doesn't scale very well, especially with Home/SOHO equipment. Unless you are far enough away from the neighbors and are content to mess around with the antennas from time to time, it doesn't stay working.

Wires are inconvenient to deploy at times. But after you set them up, they just work for the most part...

On another angle, I would be interested in hearing how people who capture things digitally, optimize or conserve storage.

Then, how do you preserve content? eg, is there a desire or need to archive stuff beyond what's available online right now...?
 
I wanted to ask the guys who reported success on this forum with Multifeed Setup

If you're interested in numbers, I published a thread comparing several multifeed scenarios I tested:

http://www.satelliteguys.us/free-ai...f-axis-gains-multisatellite-ku-reception.html

It is not all-encompassing but it showed significant performance differences for a few antenna topologies. Offset dishes came out last, a fact that is hardly surprising when one thinks about it. If I recall, linuxman subsequently found pretty much the same thing in his thread. What seemed to be most apropos for me is where the off-axis gain of a larger dish fell below the gain of a given smaller one on-axis. While all the data is in the graphs, this point could have been better amplified.

I would caution that some of the 'wider' commercial Ku offset dishes may have a better gain profile off-axis than the offset I tested. Also, I haven't had a chance to rerun my toroid measurements in a more relaxed context, but casual observations I've made since indicate they may perform a little better at the off-axis extremes than reported in my original measurements.
 
I wanted to ask the guys who reported success on this forum with Multifeed Setup:

Why did you prefer Multiple dishes with several LNBs on each to a motorized single LNB setup? What are the advantages and drawbacks of both for you personally?

Did you every consider a mixed setup like a Motorized 2-or-3 LNB dish? Anyone can report success in that department? Why did you prefer this setup to other options?

Motors are slow, They are not particularly easy to set up well. On my setups, marginal signals on certain birds are not received well. My fault probably... A bigger dish would help some...

With multi LNB setups (on the same dish, or on multiple dishes) changing channels is fast. With a stationary dish, it is much easier to tweak for weaker/marginal signals like RTV, feeds on AMC21, etc....

Is a motorized dish with multiple LNBF plausible? Is this what the poster meant? Spacing between birds varies. Ku offset type motor will compensate for skew but still... Doesn't compute for me...
 
What I mean, Multifeed Systems can be used in a single dish Motorized setup quite well as an economical or space saving option, or in locations where multiple dishes aren't allowed, for these people often watching (on a sub) most popular sats like 110 & 119 & 118.7 & 123 or 82 & 91 & 97 in a stationary way with fast switching, but at times turning the dish to watch other FTA sats. A larger round dish based 3-LNB Motorized System with Invacom Lin & Cir at focal point would serve best in that scenario. Some claim, it can't be done, but in fact it works very well.

In a 2-LNB Motorized setup, if second LNB is a Twin, using different port for each sat allows independent PVR recording. Same setup allows to receive 101W AMC4 & 110W, giving advantage to watch sub or clear preview programming. Similar setup can work in several other sat configurations, with their choice dependent on the location and second LNB type. Watch NASA at 119W via Invacom, and the White Springs on 129W G27 via the 2-nd Linear LNB. Since parabolic profile dishes allow some deg. misalignment without visibly affecting pic quality of stronger circular sats, same setup might work to preview channels at 110W & 121W G23, 82W & 93W G25, 87W AMC3 & 97 G19, 103W AMC1 & 113W SatMex6, or 113W & 123W G18 combos. A 2-Invacom LNBs setup may allow to watch any of the above combos via a 2-tuner receiver with PIP feature like SonicView 360 Elite or 2 separate receivers in different rooms. One can switch Off the second LNB in all other motor positions, so that only the central LNB can catch targeted sats' signals.
 

Attachments

  • Motorized 2-LNB Setup.jpg
    Motorized 2-LNB Setup.jpg
    48.6 KB · Views: 139
Last edited:
Any more reports on unusual combination of solutions to optimize a total home satellite TV system?

Anyone else has experience with using a Multi-LNB Motorized system? What sat combos do you usually watch with it?

How the need to Blind Scan and analyze signal spectrum, and update periodically non-listed channels & wild feeds in a sat channel lineup may affect FTA system design considerations?
 
Just wanted to add a few more possible combinations for a 3-LNB setup on a magic bracket with Invacom QPH-031 at focal point on a motorized larger dish for those Sat TV customers with subscription, where multiple dishes aren't allowed or feasible (sat positions listed when looking from behind the dish):

119W (left) - 110W (center) - 101W (right)
129W - 119W - 110W
91W - 82W - 73W
101W - 91W - 82W

More LNBs may be added in-between to watch preferred linear sats without turning the dish. For those interested in LNB mounting rules and examples, the article MULTIPLE FEED ANTENNAS and other pages on Mike Kohl's site will be a good read. Besides fast switching and simultaneous various channel watching on different receivers, an extra advantage of such setup is motor extended service life due to less frequent use.
 
Last edited:
Can someone suggest, what Switch matrix would work best for a single motorized dish with 3-LNBs (2 twins Lin. or Cir., and one central quad Invacom, no Universals), connected to 2 or 3 STB Sat Receivers for independent channel viewing on different sats regardless of channel polarity? What's the best way to connect receivers in such system, assuming there're no PC Cards or PCs involved?
 
Status
Please reply by conversation.

Changing Tp´s on 93W

trouble with 105w ku

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts