Post # 7 in that thread was:
"i came across 2 more 622's, so i have sold a total of 3, and have 2 left, and still have the 311 and d100.2 to sell and 2 dp34"
Until that time, he listed only one 622, and when asked by P Smith if he sent the 622 to the ONE GUY that paid, LER responded, saying he had received it. However, everybody's flags should have been raised when later that day Stargazer said that he bought a 622 last week, as well.
That was well AFTER everyone had already sent their money. P Smith was asking about MY 622, not LER's. LER just happened to respond saying he had received his, which is when the flags started to go up. AGAIN, that was WAY AFTER he had already taken money from multiple people. NOBODY knew anything until AFTER they had paid.
What part of this do you NOT understand?
Considering he only had one for sale the week before, something was obviously fishy.
Anybody that got ripped off by sending him money after reading Stargazer's post almost deserves their fate.
[DUH]. Had that been the case, then sure, but the fact is, as you can clearly see for yourself reading what you posted above, it was AFTER everyone had sent money. irwin posts for sale, people send emails and buy the 622 not knowing he had already sold it, because he said he still had it, quite a while later P Smith asks about MINE having been shipped, LER responds saying he received his (thinking maybe P Smith was asking about his), flags go up and I start inquiring about how it's possible that he sold me the 622 when LER was saying he received it already, irwins response via email was something about having 3 of them and having only sold 2, then Stargazers post appears saying he too bought one, so that puts up MORE flags, then irwin posts saying he had more, trying to cover his ass and buy more time. Then I started posting about it, and others started to come out of the woodwork saying they too had lost money in the same way. Stargazer posted after finding out that LER already received the 622, because he had already sent irwin money and realized something was not kosher. SEE A PATTERN HERE? There was NO INDICATION of a problem until AFTER people sent money. If it was before, nobody would have ever posted saying they were worried! [/DUH]
The thing that really amazed me was how everybody was fawning on the guy after he said he was in an accident. "Get well, Rirwin." "I hope everything's OK" "Just send the stuff, when you're feeling better and have the time." "Can I bring you some soup?" I'm exagerating, of course. But, it might have well have said those things.
There was a logic in that. Acting kind and trying to show sympathy to his situation was an attempt to make him feel like we believed and accepted his excuse, and that we were going to forgive him if he actually gets our stuff out like he promised. All the while we assumed it was nonsense, and that we'd either get a whole lot of nothing, or possibly merchandise that was not what we asked for. It allowed us to monitor him, and keep him close, so he wouldn't try to RUN. This way we had more ammunition against him when legal action is taken. Do you get it now? Do you see how simple things can be if you follow along and think just a little bit about everything?
I'm not being harsh. What he did was wrong. But, falling for this guy's BS was just as wrong. He was not that good at it.
Again, your idea of the situation is inaccurate, you apparently cannot follow along, and understand things as they have been repeatedly explained to you. Everything appeared quite normal when money was exchanged, then AFTER that money was exchanged things changed. NOBODY, as far as I'm aware, sent irwin money AFTER the flags went up. SIMPLE AS THAT.
Now, on a slightly better note, paypal ruled in my favor as well, and recovered PART of my money so far. Playing nice may have worked.