Which is partially-owned by Microsoft, which just lost a huge "battle" being HD-DVD backers.It's on MSNBC.
Which is partially-owned by Microsoft, which just lost a huge "battle" being HD-DVD backers.It's on MSNBC.
Same applies to standard DVD today and applied to HD-DVD players. Issues like this can typically be fixed with a firmware update.the thing about some of the players is true........some BD's won't play right on my friends BD player he bought early last year
They are upgradable to a point but there's this whole "profile" thing (that I admittedly don't understand). There is 1.0, 1.x, 2.0 and so on. As of today, only a PS3 can be updated from 1.0 to 2.0, for example. The lack of this support will NEVER affect playing a BluRay disc's main movie though. On some players, users won't be able to access the "extras".I'm not sure why they make such a big deal of internet connectivity. Aren't these BluRay players upgradeable (at least to some extent) by popping a burned DVD into the tray?
Which is partially-owned by Microsoft, which just lost a huge "battle" being HD-DVD backers.
Just went to the Tivo site and one of the boxes compatible with the Amazon service is their TiVo HD box. With Apple and Xbox currently offering HD downloads, I don't see why its so misleading to think TiVo and Amazon are not there or that far behind. The equipment is already in place. This is my 3rd reply to an attempt to say this was bias or confusing or what ever you label it, neither atttempt has passed the sniff test.
This reminds me of republican tactics, when you can’t attack or dispute the undisputable core of the article, do the next best thing. Try to confuse the masses by taking one sentence within the whole article and going off the deep end.
What paragraph???? It was a string of facts, individually stated in separate sentences. The core of his article was there was alternatives to BD. He then went about laying down the facts about those alternatives. What’s so confusing about that?? As far as TiVo and Amazon, I was piggy backing on his point and I said that the equipment was already in place.What I don't understand why you are so adamant about defending a poorly written paragraph. I am not calling into question the FUDness or bias of the article, all I said was that the writer made a confusing statement that if you step back and read from the point of view of the average consumer, could misinterpret it to believe that Netflix and Amazon/Tivo already offer HD downloads.
Microsoft may not own any of it anymore but you go to their site and MS definitely still has influence.
I think GE owns NBC and Universal? Hmmmmmm.
:upIt's called good advice.
Every reason in that article is why I won't buy a bluray player and that has been my gripe with bluray since day one.
It's on MSNBC.
Is Consumer Reports better?Oh ...It's on MICROSOFTNBC !!!! SO it must be true ?:down
While I'm still not crazy about using the word "obsolete," at least this article just gives the facts and lets the reader decide for themselves.
The player pictured in the article is an HD DVD player.While I'm still not crazy about using the word "obsolete," at least this article just gives the facts and lets the reader decide for themselves.