Haha, are poor people really to blame is all I'm asking.
On the topic of quality, when I've viewed Charter and Dish Network locally, picture quality for these subscription services is pretty awful. Wonder why people tolerate this stuff?
The local television shop showed me Fox OTA vs. Dish Network for the same football game, OTA had the better picture. That was a few years ago, not sure about today.
Seems to me HD ought to mean one minimal standard before you can call it HD. Otherwise the provider must label it something less. "We offer more shoddy quality "substandard HD" channels than the competition for the same price."
Truth in advertising.
On the topic of quality, when I've viewed Charter and Dish Network locally, picture quality for these subscription services is pretty awful. Wonder why people tolerate this stuff?
The local television shop showed me Fox OTA vs. Dish Network for the same football game, OTA had the better picture. That was a few years ago, not sure about today.
Seems to me HD ought to mean one minimal standard before you can call it HD. Otherwise the provider must label it something less. "We offer more shoddy quality "substandard HD" channels than the competition for the same price."
Truth in advertising.