While I love football, I thought of this as well. Price we have to pay I guess
Thats why they invented DVR's !
NFL 2012 Off season notes & transactions
- Thread starter Rey
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 190
- Views 14K
- Status
Thats why they invented DVR's !
To follow up on Bill's post on SB favorites, here's where some other teams rank below on the list:
the defending champ NY Giants are 18/1, Pittsburgh and Baltimore are both 15/1.
Dallas, normally high on the list, is tied with Detroit and Atlanta at 20/1. The NY Jets are 30/1.
my Bills are 40/1, Salsa's Raiders are 60/1, Rey's Dolphins are 50/1, and six teams are tied at 100/1 (Rams, Browns, Bucs, Vikings, Colts, Jaguars).
the defending champ NY Giants are 18/1, Pittsburgh and Baltimore are both 15/1.
Dallas, normally high on the list, is tied with Detroit and Atlanta at 20/1. The NY Jets are 30/1.
my Bills are 40/1, Salsa's Raiders are 60/1, Rey's Dolphins are 50/1, and six teams are tied at 100/1 (Rams, Browns, Bucs, Vikings, Colts, Jaguars).
SabresRule said:
Lol... my Raiders are coming off a decent season with tons of injuries to starters and the Dolphins have better odds?! LOL
Odds reflect the flow of money on all sides and the likelihood of the team to win, in that order.
If money isnt coming in on the Raiders the odds will continue to drop to entice betters.
If money was coming in on the Raiders, the odds would rise to balance exposure.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
If money isnt coming in on the Raiders the odds will continue to drop to entice betters.
If money was coming in on the Raiders, the odds would rise to balance exposure.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Hardly. Odds are just much more than who odds makers think will win.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Well, we are talking about the Raiders, right??It goes to show you that Vegas and odds makers are not synonymous with football knowledge. BUT, maybe they know some 'inside dope' we don't ....
over/under on Raiders win total is 7 wins also... I think another .500 season is reasonable-to-optimistic with all non-division away games being played EST, and hosting the Saints, Steelers, Bucs, Jags and Browns.
New coach, new scheme, same old Raiders, in transition since 2003.
New coach, new scheme, same old Raiders, in transition since 2003.
He LOOKS fantastic... WITHOUT getting hit.
...yet the Raiders with a first time head coach are playoff-bound...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Now that the Raiders and Lions are relavant on the field, who replaces them as one of the worst teams overall in football?
When I first came here, Detroit and Oakland were getting the most mockery- now, who replaces them there?
When I first came here, Detroit and Oakland were getting the most mockery- now, who replaces them there?
The Browns and Dolphins have been aimless for what seems like nearly just as long. I don't the the Lions belong in the same sentence as the Raiders. They've become more relevant by finally reaching .500 but it's on the back of a fragile runner and a QB still looking to make a comeback.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Until the Cardinals went to the Super Bowl a few years ago, I thought they were THE laughingstock of the NFL (and maybe all North American sports). IIRC, they won one (1) playoff game in 70 years previous to that.
or manning
I actually like Kansas City in that division. IMO, there's no great team, but also no "bad" team in the very competiitive AFC West.
Weakest point of the Chiefs is QB, Cassel is so boom or bust and rarely simply mediocre. I am hopeful but not very optimistic.
meStevo said:
...so according to you, a QB with 4 SERIOUS neck surgeries..is MORE of a sure thing...than a 1st year coach...? LMAO! ok...
Everyone is entitled to their opinion...
- Status
Similar threads
