NFL 2008-09 Season
- Thread starter IcEWoLF
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 4K
- Views 204K
After so many Monday Night blowouts (Giants/Browns, Broncos/Patriots, Colts/Titans, Steelers/Redskins), we got a hell of a game.
Cards do NOT blow it for once- that's what they usually do.
Cards do NOT blow it for once- that's what they usually do.
I've changed my mind- Kurt Warner is my new NFL Player of the Week (32-42, 328, 3 touchdowns, 0 interceptions).
To be fair, for once, we got a Monday game that was up in the air in the final 10 minutes.
This was the first competitive Monday Night Football game since Ravens/Steelers.
No. I'm saying that there are plenty of other NFL divisions in history where other teams had bad records.
This year's NFC West is one of many. Remember the old NFC Central in the mid-80s where it was the Bears and a bunch of bad teams?
Yes, but the difference is you could put the '85 Bears or the '07 Patriots and place them in ANY division and they would have won it.
The ONLY reason that the Cardinals get in the playoffs is because of the pitiful division they play in.
BIG DIFFERENCE!!!
I know it's a pathetic division (Remember, I have NOT said Arizona will hoist the Lombardi Trophy this year), but I will give them some credit.
I'm not going to rank them high in my Power Rankings (that'll be tomorrow, BTW), but I'll give them credit for this- they won a game they usually lose.
99 times out of 100, Arizona loses this type of game. This was the one other one.
Next week is a BIG ONE- my Bills vs. HD MM's Browns.
Winner of that has a good shot to stay in the playoff race!
Winner of that has a good shot to stay in the playoff race!
I do agree with Bill on many things about Arizona- they've had a bad history, lack of success, they play in a bad division.
One thing we can agree on- their recievers (Boldin, Fitzgerald, Breaston) are great.
BTW, why is it that wide recievers drafted by the Lions flame out, yet wideouts drafted by the Arizona Cardinals turn into very good players?
Neither franchise has had a great history, yet one team has good wideouts, yet the other doesn't.
One thing we can agree on- their recievers (Boldin, Fitzgerald, Breaston) are great.
BTW, why is it that wide recievers drafted by the Lions flame out, yet wideouts drafted by the Arizona Cardinals turn into very good players?
Neither franchise has had a great history, yet one team has good wideouts, yet the other doesn't.
That was a terrible play call at the end of the game. Almost anything else would have been better. A fullback dive from the 3? Are you kidding me? If they threw it the Cardinals probably would have been flagged for interference.
Can ESPN flex out of that? How many Browns games do we have to be subjected to?
