New GEOSATpro microHD Receiver

  • Server Issues.

    We are very aware that there have been system issues the past few days. In troubleshooting the system, it has been determined that the issue is at our provider and is hardware related. As of 12:05 PM ET our provider has moved us to a new server.

    Things seem to be running better on this new server. However in trying to diagnose the issue (before finding out it was a hardware issue) we made some system changes which we need to undo. So if you find any issues or errors please let us know in the Operations Center Forum.

    Thank you for your patience! Sorry for the issue!
    CLICK THE X IN THE TOP RIGHT CORNER OF THE BOX TO DISMISS THIS MESSAGE
Status
Please reply by conversation.
At this price point, I hope the mistake is not made of cutting broadly wanted features and/or quality. It is wiser to raise the retail price as necessary to make a profit so ongoing support and development of the product can take place over the longer term.
I think that this has been established, cyberham, that neither features nor quality are being sacrificed. Price is also a feature. People want a low price, look at all those bargain boxes with the same Ali chipsets that are perpetually waiting for the next firmware to solve simple problems that Manhattan cured in a matter of weeks -- yet people praise the bargain boxes anyway. That is fine. But to me, things like s-t-u-t-t-e-r-i-n-g video and clocks that won't work are not acceptable. It seems to me the era of the quirky, semi-reliable, sluggish FTA box that "might die any day now" (if you didn't get lucky) has come to a close. This microHD box will sell at a price close to the bargain box that one user now plans to use for target practice. By the way, the profit margin on those bargain boxes appears large enough to have paid for the ongoing development that never happened. You don't always get what you pay for. Fortunately, here at this forum, for any new box that hits the market we have Iceberg with his flamethrower -- he does not mince words or cut anyone any slack in his product evaluations. May the best boxes win.
 
Looking at the photo of the unit on his hands can tell this is a really micro unit!!! really Really small!!!
 
I think that this has been established, cyberham, that neither features nor quality are being sacrificed. Price is also a feature. People want a low price, look at all those bargain boxes with the same Ali chipsets that are perpetually waiting for the next firmware to solve simple problems that Manhattan cured in a matter of weeks -- yet people praise the bargain boxes anyway. That is fine. But to me, things like s-t-u-t-t-e-r-i-n-g video and clocks that won't work are not acceptable. It seems to me the era of the quirky, semi-reliable, sluggish FTA box that "might die any day now" (if you didn't get lucky) has come to a close. This microHD box will sell at a price close to the bargain box that one user now plans to use for target practice. By the way, the profit margin on those bargain boxes appears large enough to have paid for the ongoing development that never happened. You don't always get what you pay for. Fortunately, here at this forum, for any new box that hits the market we have Iceberg with his flamethrower -- he does not mince words or cut anyone any slack in his product evaluations. May the best boxes win.

Wholeheartedly agree. I trust that SatelliteAV will work with this box and make it the best out there, bar none. The work that has already been done in pre-release is staggering compared to anything else out there!

Best of all, we will have a trusted firmware developer working HERE, not some unknown entity somewhere in China...
 
Even though i do have two receivers now that do s2 HD i will most likely get one of these fine new receivers
from GOSAT.I dont really know brian personally but from what i have read from him here on this forum i respect and admire what he says and think will put out a great product.In the meantime im going to have to think of a good story to tell my wife why i need a new receiver:D
 
I got to talk to Brian about the new box yesterday and it sounds almost perfect... I say almost because its missing the 4:2:2. Brian being a SatelliteGuys himself knows what we are looking for in a FTA receiver and aims to give the FTA community what they are looking for. The way it's sounding this could soon be our reference box.

I can't wait to see it! :)
 
I'd rather have HD & DVB-S2 available than 4:2:2 honestly. With so few 4:2:2 feeds out there its really not needed
 
I'd rather have HD & DVB-S2 available than 4:2:2 honestly. With so few 4:2:2 feeds out there its really not needed

i agree, have you guys noticed how few 4:2:2 feeds are posted now?
the number has drastically decreased over the last year or two.
its outdated technology, in another year i bet that 4:2:2 will be as useful as vc2.
no point in putting in a much more expensive chipset just to support outdated technology that will probably not even be used in another year.
 
i agree, have you guys noticed how few 4:2:2 feeds are posted now?
the number has drastically decreased over the last year or two.
its outdated technology, in another year i bet that 4:2:2 will be as useful as vc2.
no point in putting in a much more expensive chipset just to support outdated technology that will probably not even be used in another year.

4:2:2 was big in SD feeds when HD was a novelty. The 2 big sports network conglomerates (ESPN & FSN) used that on the SD feeds. With ESPN pretty much doing everything HD now and FSN scrambling the feeds 4:2:2 really isnt used much
 
Random thoughts:

Someone mentioned teletext and closed captions. Both my Manhattan and Solomend will show teletext with their own OSD display. The Solomend/Openbox firmware that I run will also pass teletext data in the VBI of the composite output when in PAL mode. Neither will display or pass closed caption data.

As Brian has mentioned previously, OSD display of closed captions would be necessary when using HDMI or component output. If that could be accomplished with any HD FTA satellite receiver, the hearing impaired market would be gained. Also useful for learning another language or when trying to decipher heavily accented speech.

It's nice to see at least a couple of North American based FTA receiver lines that want to cater to our needs, rather than concentrate their efforts on adding yet more ways to cardshare. coughOpenboxcough
 
I just recently realized that the S9 will not display subtitles while watching a recording of an opera performance that was inadvertently recorded from the Latin American feed. Working subtitles would certainly be a plus!

As for the lack of 4:2:2, the microHD would still be able to record such programs for playback on another device, such as a PC or hardware media player.
 
Random thoughts:

Someone mentioned teletext and closed captions. Both my Manhattan and Solomend will show teletext with their own OSD display. The Solomend/Openbox firmware that I run will also pass teletext data in the VBI of the composite output when in PAL mode. Neither will display or pass closed caption data.

As Brian has mentioned previously, OSD display of closed captions would be necessary when using HDMI or component output. If that could be accomplished with any HD FTA satellite receiver, the hearing impaired market would be gained. Also useful for learning another language or when trying to decipher heavily accented speech.

It's nice to see at least a couple of North American based FTA receiver lines that want to cater to our needs, rather than concentrate their efforts on adding yet more ways to cardshare. coughOpenboxcough

That was the only disappointing problem I have with the OpenBox. No CC. That being said, though, I still use my antiquated CNX Duo in the living room as the only receiver there, and IT does closed captioning. The more I read, I am thinking I need one of these to put in the bedroom, and replace the DUO with my OpenBox from the bedroom to the living room.

Photto
 
I'd rather have HD & DVB-S2 available than 4:2:2 honestly. With so few 4:2:2 feeds out there its really not needed

I was motivated to get 4:2:2 to see the CBS stuff in HD.
But now the local cable co. has moved several HD channels into the poor peoples line up at no extra charge (can you believe that) so now even less of a need for it.
Yea sports feeds, I don't watch sports, my wife does, but she hates the sat system, so no 4:2:2 for me at this time.
 
Will the MicroHD be able to play Local Streams?
A nice work around would be to stream from PC / Sat Card to MicroHD.

No wired or wireless LAN connection. The microHD supports satellite or USB file playout.

Side note: I use a Teleview TVB590 PCI card to modulate a "transponder" for viewing programs on connected STBs in the facility and at home. A little trick that I use is to modulate a TS file just above or below the Standard LNBF IF range and use a combiner (reversed 1ppp splitter) to insert along with the signal from the dish. The satellite receiver will always see this "transponder" on any satellite scan. I.E 12200 is a programmed "transponder" on my receiver to watch live or recorded TS via the computer.

I know..... Overkill, but fun!!!
 
Status
Please reply by conversation.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 10)

Top