This receiver sounds interesting, and if you can ever get the ability to do 4:2:2 signals, even if it meant increasing the price, you would have one heck of an STB that could outdo the azbox and take away most of their business over here.
I like what I have heard so far and hope that there would be a future receiver to do those 4:2:2 signals as this would be the bread winner for many!
4:2:2 solution would increase the cost of a receiver considerably. Since there are several options available for receiving 4:2:2, we instead chose to focus on a this solution to provide the most requested features, with a USA based development and support team at a very competitive price. We have no development plans for a 4:2:2 consumer set-top box at this time. S2 (8psk, 16psk, 32psk) transmissions are quickly becoming the preferred encoding and I expect 4:2:2 usage to continue to decline as older legacy equipment is upgraded.
Your perception of the AZbox share in the North American satellite receiver market is greatly inflated. AZbox sales in North America are extremely low and are purchased by a small niche group of hobbyists. The incentive to take away most of their North American business would not be a lucrative proposal.... The AZbox is a great 4:2:2 solution and well supported. An even better economical and elegant solution is the current S2 PC cards with blindscan and support of all current formats and encodings.
On a second note, what about the satellite lists in the receiver? are they going to be separate by C & ku ?
Will the end user have the ability to program in their own satellites?
The receiver currently supports 150 satellite and 100 DiSEqC 1.2 positions. The factory list was built from submissions by several SatelliteGuy members and is separated by KU and C-bands. You may either perform direct entry, edit and deletion of satellite, transponder, channel information or use a channel editor. Your set-up scenario is supported with 150 satellite positions.