Clemson was the only tough team they played! Clemson is the only team they played that is left in the rankings!
NCAA Football 2011-2012
- Thread starter The Insider
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 2K
- Views 114K
Clemson was the only tough team they played! Clemson is the only team they played that is left in the rankings!
msmith198025 said:
Compare wins...how many wins does 'Bama have against top 20 and how many does OSU have. I could have sworn OSU had more... I could be wrong.
lol yeah but ya know VT is funny ya never know which team is going to show up - the team that destroyed UVA or the team that got smacked by Clemson who knows but ohh well should be a good game to watch.
No.."my dad can beat up your dad...." Oh geez, here we go again.... 
This has little do with conference and everything to do with wins and loses.
It is very apparent bad loses(losing to an unranked team) mean much more than quality wins(throttling a top 10 team).
It sucks, but there is no other choice we have at the present time.
Too bad, I personally think an OSU vs. LSU game would have been a much better game and more likely, the only ones that feel differently are the VERY fortunate 'Bama fans and the SEC marks.
This has little do with conference and everything to do with wins and loses.
It is very apparent bad loses(losing to an unranked team) mean much more than quality wins(throttling a top 10 team).
It sucks, but there is no other choice we have at the present time.
Too bad, I personally think an OSU vs. LSU game would have been a much better game and more likely, the only ones that feel differently are the VERY fortunate 'Bama fans and the SEC marks.
We have no choice but we can make it one of the lowest rated games in BCS Championship history. I personally refuse to watch this game in protest.
JAG72 said:
I'll watch it on three TVs to cancel you out.
Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
Just so we are all clear though in 2008 it was proposed a 4 game play off.. The SEC and Slive were a big pusher of this. It was blocked however by the Big 12. big 10 and big east...
The Insider said:
Would have prevented this. Oh well. Blame them. Not us.
Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
I don't blame the SEC, I blame the system in general. The only way things will change is if the money is not there.
The Insider said:
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/10105947
I suggested a book earlier in thread, "Death to the BCS"
They had the PAC 10 and Big 12 on board with a plus 1, but the big 10 resisted because of the Rose Bowl. Btw, the big east resisted also, but you could do something without them because their schools are non-competitive
msmith198025 said:
Not saying you did. I just don't know and on my phone and not on a computer.
The Insider said:
And the reason those teams voted yes was because they knew the others voted no...
Really? The SEC voted for a play off because others voted no?
How about the SEC just wants to decide the game on the field and not in the polls. They know what its like to be screwed with a certain undefeated Auburn team few years back
Had the other teams above Bama won, then it wouldnt have mattered.
Ok State got the same mulligan, theirs just didnt quite get them there.
Hell any team that wasnt LSU that would have went would have "gotten a mulligan".
Similar threads
