SandraC said:Here's what it means:
What used to be the NBA players union turned down the owners’ most-recent proposal without polling its full membership. For weeks, many around the league believed that had all the players been asked, most would have been in favor of accepting a deal, in order to get back on the court, continue getting paid and avoid the very real possibility of losing the entire season.
So why was the union not willing to put this to a vote of its membership—or at least poll all the players—even under David Stern’s threat that offers from the owners would just get worse from here?
That is a good point. But if so many were FOR the deal on the table...why have they not spoken out? I mean, you have the Cavs player rep, Anthony Parker...he gets paid $2 million UNDER the league average and he was completely FOR rejecting the deal. You have Matt Carroll, the Charlotte Bobcats player rep...he makes $1 million UNDER the league average...also, stating that he was against the last offer of the owners...
Am I saying that I agree with the so called "almost unanimous" qoute... I doubt it, but I do not think there is as many as some perceive to be.