Here's a question. Is there enough bandwidth on 61.5 or 129 to run all these new HD channels at a decent quality level under MPEG2, or are the channels going to be piss-poor until they switch to MPEG4?
My own primitive tests in encoding show MPEG4 to be at least half the bandwidth/size of MPEG2, although I read something that said a MPEG2 signal at 5mbps was the equivalent of an MPEG4 signal at 1.8mbps, going by peak signal to RMS noise ratio.
All I know is a 50mb mpeg2 video file was about 25mb in mpeg4, and I couldn't visually tell the difference between them.
Hopefully there's plenty of bandwidth, and the switch to mpeg4 will free up more, making room to add more "compelling" hd programming.
My own primitive tests in encoding show MPEG4 to be at least half the bandwidth/size of MPEG2, although I read something that said a MPEG2 signal at 5mbps was the equivalent of an MPEG4 signal at 1.8mbps, going by peak signal to RMS noise ratio.
All I know is a 50mb mpeg2 video file was about 25mb in mpeg4, and I couldn't visually tell the difference between them.
Hopefully there's plenty of bandwidth, and the switch to mpeg4 will free up more, making room to add more "compelling" hd programming.