Maybe it's me...but I guess I will never understand the thinking of paying everyday player contracts to players that only play every forth or fifth day.
I hear you.
Maybe it's me...but I guess I will never understand the thinking of paying everyday player contracts to players that only play every forth or fifth day.
I hear you.
The pitcher is the largest single factor to a win or a loss. Like the saying goes, momentum is tomorrow's starting pitcher.
Maybe it's me...but I guess I will never understand the thinking of paying everyday player contracts to players that only play every forth or fifth day.
The pitcher is the largest single factor to a win or a loss. Like the saying goes, momentum is tomorrow's starting pitcher.
Trust me Salsa, it's not just you!Maybe it's me...but I guess I will never understand the thinking of paying everyday player contracts to players that only play every forth or fifth day.
Trust me Salsa, it's not just you!
When that pitcher is the face of your franchise and the single most important factor to winning every 5th game. I saw a stat that shows an ACE pitcher directly contributes to more wins in a season than the average top position player by himself.Maybe it's me...but I guess I will never understand the thinking of paying everyday player contracts to players that only play every forth or fifth day.
http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/mlb/...mplete-clayton-kershaw-deal-not-done-spendingThe Dodgers on Friday pointed to a confluence of factors that made them more comfortable committing so many dollars to a starting pitcher given the risks involved. They addressed Kershaw's charitable contributions, reasons behind him winning Roberto Clemente and Branch Rickey awards, as well as his work ethic and drive. They mentioned his age; he won't turn 26 until March. They also said they were able to get insurance to cover part of their losses if Kershaw is injured during the life of the contract.
"We know all the precedents, we know the risks," Kasten said. "A big part of this, for us, was getting as much protection from insurance as we could."
The Dodgers began talking to Kershaw about an extension last March, and there were reports going into the season that they were close to a deal similar to the one he signed this week. They said the talks were slowed by the distractions of the season and then by the Dodgers' need to shore up the rest of their team through free agency and trade talks. Finally, after Kershaw filed for arbitration Tuesday, the talks heated up.
Kershaw flew to Los Angeles on Tuesday for a physical. He did not attend Friday's media conference, instead calling in from his Dallas-area home. Kershaw, who would have reached free agency next November, said he never envisioned himself pitching for another team.
"I just kind of always had a feeling that it was going to work out and I didn't really let my mind get too much past it," Kershaw said.
The pitcher has founded and supported an orphanage in the African nation of Zambia as well as starting after-school programs for underprivileged kids in both Los Angeles and Dallas. He said he plans on extending his charitable efforts with the money from the new contract.
I am going to somewhat disagree. IF a pitcher fails to STOP runs from scoring, the offense can always bail him out. IF the offense fails, the best a starting pitcher can do is end his 8 or 9 innings at 0-0. In fact, to me, in some cases, relief is just as, if not more important than starting pitching.
But that's my warped thinking of course...
IF you could guarantee me that the starting pitcher was going to give me 50-60 starts...then I would have no issues with it. But in average...we are talking 35 starts a season, if I am not mistaken.
When that pitcher is the face of your franchise and the single most important factor to winning every 5th game. I saw a stat that shows an ACE pitcher directly contributes to more wins in a season than the average top position player by himself.
Average WAR numbers for top starters is higher than top position players most years, and this while playing fewer games.
I agree that WAR is overused and not always a good indicator. But it is when comparing numbers between two completely different aspects of baseball. It is the only variable we can use to compare an offensive/defensive player to a pitcher.While I agree with your first statement ...
I question why WAR has to come up all the time ..
Your talking about a STUD pitcher, OF COURSE he's gonna be better than the "Guy they bring up from AAA" which is what they consider an AVG WAR player.
Personally, I think the WAR is blown WAY out of proportion.
Just saying ...
Nothing against you here.
This had me cracking up!
<img src="http://www.satelliteguys.us/attachment.php?attachmentid=94669"/>